Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, workers have had an important role in the societies. Many organizations are workers advocate and are struggling to hear their voices. Its importance leads to some controversy; some people want to know how workers would be satisfied by doing different tasks or just one. One statement in this case that is often brought up is that workers prefer to do just one task during the day, in contrast, I personally believe that they would be happy if let them do different tasks. In the lines to follow, I will investigate some reasons to shed light on my response.
One of the paramount reasons which deserves to be mentioned is that the new task looks like a breath of fresh air. Not only could a new task physically relax them, but also could relax them mentally. Indeed, workers how practice different tasks, wouldn't sense the passing of time rather than someone who just do and one arduous task. Take, for example, when I used to work at Pegah's company in Khorramabad, I accepted many responsibilities such as maintenance, cleaning my room, and typing. Although I did a plethora of work, I was very satisfied. Never did I look at my watch. In contrast, when I had done just one task, I was always anxious when I would be off. Therefore, doing just one task was mentally boring for me and instead of doing several works was appealing.
Another reason coming to mind is that these workers would be healthier. Should workers do one task, they would have to sit on a chair or take a position for a long time. Take, for example, when I used to type in Pegah's company, I sat on a chair for about 8 hours. When I got up, I got an excruciating backache. Indeed, I got sick and expended large expenses for healing. If not for that job, I would be healthier now.
Finally, doing several tasks would bring about creativity. Workers who take charge more than one duty would learn a wide variety of things. Take, for example, one of my friends is working in Iranian Automotive Industry. He is doing four tasks in the company. Working in the different areas, make him a jack-of-all-trades. Not only does he the mechanical works, but also electronic. When I needed him in order to wire my home, he accepted promptly. He was very satisfied with doing several duties. He thought, if not for working at this company and accepting several tasks, he wouldn't be able to do off-company works and make extra money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
..., workers how practice different tasks, wouldnt sense the passing of time rather than s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 576, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...company and accepting several tasks, he wouldnt be able to do off-company works and mak...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59534883721 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67140376076 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506976744186 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7794654266 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5714285714 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3571428571 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305030941214 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796480559683 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065969169462 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192737882774 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331071646774 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 11.7677419355 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.