Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, workers have had an important role in the societies. Many organizations are workers advocate and are struggling to hear their voices. Its importance leads to some controversy; some people want to know how workers would be satisfied by doing different tasks or just one. One statement in this case that is often brought up is that workers prefer to do just one task during the day, in contrast, I personally believe that they would be happy if let them do different tasks. In the lines to follow, I will investigate some reasons to shed light on my response.
One of the paramount reasons which deserves to be mentioned is that the new task looks like a breath of fresh air. Not only could a new task physically relax them, but also could relax them mentally. Indeed, workers how practice different tasks, wouldn't sense the passing of time rather than someone who just do and one arduous task. Take, for example, when I used to work at Pegah's company in Khorramabad, I accepted many responsibilities such as maintenance, cleaning my room, and typing. Although I did a plethora of work, I was very satisfied. Never did I look at my watch. In contrast, when I had done just one task, I was always anxious when I would be off. Therefore, doing just one task was mentally boring for me and instead of doing several works was appealing.
Another reason coming to mind is that these workers would be healthier. Should workers do one task, they would have to sit on a chair or take a position for a long time. It goes without saying that, individuals need at least a 15-minute break after one hour work. If they don't do that, their blood would be still and cause long time consequences. Take, for example, when I used to type in Pegah's company, I sat on a chair for about 8 hours. When I got up, I got an excruciating backache. Indeed, I got sick and expended large expenses for healing. If not for that job, I would be healthier now.
In conclusion, to sum both reasons up, let use the Pareto rule which also known as 80/20 rule. In a nutshell, when come to making a decision based on the Pareto rule, vailing 20 percent of reasons could fulfil 80 percent of the solution. Consequently, both discussed reasons outweigh other potential reasons and are sufficient to substantiate the contention that workers which do several duties are happier than some workers which just do one task.
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular activity in 2010. 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
..., workers how practice different tasks, wouldnt sense the passing of time rather than s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nute break after one hour work. If they dont do that, their blood would be still and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, so, still, therefore, at least, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60655737705 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62357177327 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533957845433 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6122180574 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9583333333 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7916666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32283544974 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843330201741 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698205996455 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198963148058 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273735232947 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.