working as team versus working alone.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that humans are social animals and can not survive without each other. In this regard, working as a team is of paramount importance. It is a famous saying that intelligence wins games but teamwork wins the championship. There are different schools of thought among individuals on whether to work as a team or work individually. If I were asked, I would agree with the notion of working as a team. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my stance is associated with the notion when people are working together they learn from each other and solve problems together, this leads to their success. As a case in mind, during the first year of my University, our pharmacology professor assigned students to work in groups for an assignment. At the start of the project, everyone was working independently, but then we encounter a problem. Actually, we had to plot the data on the computer model that was a technical task and, it was not our area of expertise. First, I was hesitant to ask for help, but then I discussed it with my group members. I was amazed to found that one of my group member's brother was a computer expert. She helped us in presenting the data. Not only this, I helped my other group fellows who were weak in dosage calculations. We worked strenuously together and submitted our assignments. Surprisingly, my group stood first in the class. If we had not worked as a team, we would not have solved the problem that results in our success.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that working in a group saves time and effort. When people work independently, they have to search all the information and look for each and every aspect on their own, it takes lots of time and hard work. On the other hand, working in a group lessen that burden. My personal opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own example, Last year, my history professor gives us an assignment about ancient civilization. That was a diverse topic so the professor gives us fifteen days to finish the work. I talked to my best friend and, we distributed the assignment work with each other. I collected all the data from the library, she searched over the internet for information and we made notes. Then, we work collaboratively and prepared our presentation. To our surprise, we were able to finish the presentation in a week. on the other hand, our class fellow, who planned to work individually had to spend a lot of time and even she could not finish her assignment on time. My example manifests that working in a team saves people time and energy.
By perusing the above paragraph, one can infer that working as a team has innumerable advantages. For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating. First, it helps solve problems. Second, It saves time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l reasons to substantiate my viewpoint. The first compelling reason corroboratin...
^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...rking in a group lessen that burden. My personal opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 894, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... to finish the presentation in a week. on the other hand, our class fellow, who p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, second, so, then, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.716796875 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81682542282 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4921875 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 30.0 9.59856630824 313% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1369665206 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.46875 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53125 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304626625797 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101537969595 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111066812668 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223844263378 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773230435634 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.