Would you prefer interrupting the teachers and pointing out their mistakes or saying nothing?
Obviously, everybody makes mistakes and no one in this world is innocent of making mistakes. However, it is going to leave wider effect when people makes mistake as a lecturer or teacher. Due to the fact that in such situation, more people are listening to you and learning from you. When I realize that the lecturer is making a mistake which I am aware of, I would prefer not interrupting them and discuss about that issue afterward. In what follows I will elaborate my perspective.
First of all, correcting inaccurate speech of the teacher or a leader can make them feel embarrassed. Besides, by being interrupted, they may forget what they were explaining about. To shed light on this, let me come up with an example. I remember once in a biology class my teacher made a mistake. He was talking about an animal which I had done many research about previously. He introduced that creature as a reptile, however, I was sure that animal is a mammal. Thus, I interrupted him right away to point out this issue. Consequently, he became embarrassed of his mistake and he was not confident enough to continue the class as well as always.
On the other hand, saying nothing about that mistake does not seem to be an appropriate solution and it seems like admiring a wrong issue is right. If we would lack courage of challenging the thinking independently, the society will never make progress. Additionally, it might mislead other students and they would never become aware of the truth. I recall once my English teacher pronounced the word of "exquisite" wrongly. We started repeating that word wrongly as well and since no one told him what the accurate pronunciation of that word was, we were all misled.
Finally, if I would be in such situation, I would not choose any of interrupting the teacher or saying nothing. In my opinion in such a dilemma, speaking later in person with the lecturer is a more efficient solution. Since by this way, the speech of them is going to continue smoothly and after talking about the question and sharing opinions, teachers can convey the result to the other students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
...alking about an animal which I had done many research about previously. He introduced that cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...enough to continue the class as well as always. On the other hand, saying nothing ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, talking about, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80601092896 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85594938558 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1225991728 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7619047619 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245058676511 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611011249438 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690400000829 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135511142328 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361657526167 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.