Would you prefer interrupting the teachers and pointing out their mistakes or saying nothing
Obviously, everybody makes mistakes and no one in this world is innocent of making mistakes. However, it is going to leave wider effect when people makes mistake as a lecturer or teacher. Due to the fact that in such situation, more people are listening to you and learning from you. When I realize that the lecturer is making a mistake which I am aware of, I would prefer not interrupting them and discuss about that issue afterward. In what follows I will elaborate my perspective.
First of all, correcting inaccurate speech of the teacher or a leader can make them feel embarrassed. Besides, by being interrupted, they may forget what they were explaining about. To shed light on this, let me come up with an example. I remember once in a biology class my teacher made a mistake. He was talking about an animal which I had done many research about previously. He introduced that creature as a reptile, however, I was sure that animal is a mammal. Thus, I interrupted him right away to point out this issue. Consequently, he became embarrassed of his mistake and he was not confident enough to continue the class as well as always.
On the other hand, saying nothing about that mistake does not seem to be an appropriate solution and it seems like admiring a wrong issue is right. If we would lack courage of challenging the thinking independently, the society will never make progress. Additionally, it might mislead other students and they would never become aware of the truth. I recall once my English teacher pronounced the word of "exquisite" wrongly. We started repeating that word wrongly as well and since no one told him what the accurate pronunciation of that word was, we were all misled.
Another equally fact to be mentioned is that by speaking after the class and exploring the reality, we might understand that our own opinion is not true. Of course it might last many hours to speak on the subject and exploring the truth and by talking later privately, we avoid making misunderstanding for other students beside it does not take time of them.
Finally, if I would be in such situation, I would not choose any of interrupting the teacher or saying nothing. In my opinion in such a dilemma, speaking later in person with the lecturer is a more efficient solution. Since by this way, the speech of them is going to continue smoothly and after talking about the question and sharing opinions, teachers can convey the result to the other students.
- Independent writing TPO 51 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 73
- glasses of the building misleads birds and they fly through them compare solutions from writing and listening 75
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sch 70
- Should parents give money to their children for studying 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
...alking about an animal which I had done many research about previously. He introduced that cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 642, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...enough to continue the class as well as always. On the other hand, saying nothing abo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, of course, talking about, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78088578089 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82792760562 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519813519814 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4139008036 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1739130435 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82608695652 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220096920341 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557879836443 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681795490689 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108408913862 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631228364466 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.