Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before?
Professors are vital parts of every society. Countries try to expand and support their educational system by professor who has effect on the future of countries’ people. Some students believe that they should take those courses which are taught by professors who teach before, while others disagree and assert that professors who did not have any classes in the past years of study teach better. In my view, I prefer to take courses with professors whose experience other classes already for two important reasons.
First, when professors have had several courses in the past, they have good experience to teach. It takes so much time to be familiar with different aspects of every work. As over time, when individuals work in specific field which they graduated from, they learn various knowledge and information to teach. For example, when I was at Urmia university which was the oldest one in Iran, I selected mechanical engineering to study since the university’s professor were so famous in this major. However, in those years, the manager of the university decided to employ new inexperienced professors who never teach after PhD graduation. During the semester, because of the lack of teaching experiences, they could not teach and manage schedule very well to finish the books. Unfortunately, I failed to pass all exams because I had not enough knowledge. This experience shows me, taking courses with those professors who have had teaching experience is so essential.
Second, professors who have had several courses before are so skilled to connect different field of study to each other. By flourishing technology, students need to get information in various sciences if they want to progress in the future. Their teachers have critical role on their knowledge since they have taught a lot of courses already in different areas. For instance, when I was at high school, I had a mathematics course with a professor who was retired from other school. He knew everything about not only math but also physics and chemistry. When he started to teach in class, all students tried to focus since he could communicate varied field of study at the same time. Surprisingly, all of the students could get higher average which was so crucial to go university as our teacher taught us how to see different study together. As you can see, when professors are accomplished, they know how to teach better.
In conclusion, students should take courses only with professors who have experienced to teach other courses already. These professors not only have a vast experience but also are so adept to connect different field of study. All schools and universities should recruit only professors who have work in teaching job already.
- tpo 21drug delivery 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friend Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Visiting museums is the best way to learn a country 70
- Grades marks encourage students to learn 70
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...f study at the same time. Surprisingly, all of the students could get higher average which...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09354120267 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75883895956 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496659242762 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7079614825 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4347826087 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324082765787 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101171507709 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902859780762 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220775406028 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554096509819 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.