Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
In every semester, university students are asked to register for compulsory courses and optional courses, which enables them to encounter different professors in each course. An undeniable fact is that new professors can bring about a sense of refreshment to students with new speaking styles, which might mislead some people to generate the opinion that choosing the courses taught by unfamiliar professors is a more desirable choice. However, this view suffers from logical and factual fallacies. As far as academic performance and the pace of the course are concerned, I would give a priority to the professor whom I am familiar with.
First and foremost,familiar professor can provide us with constructive and tailor-made advice so that students can better improve their academic performances. As a matter of fact, based on the previous exposure by grading students’ assignments, assessing our presentations and solving the raised questions during office hours, familiar professors can get better insight into those who register for their courses before. As a result, they are able to know their strengths and limitations and thus offer tailor-made suggestions on new academic projects. My personal experience can be a compelling example of this. The last time when I selected one course named Art History taught by professor Hill. He knew me well through the prior contact by evaluating my final paper and giving guidance on group projects in another course he taught. Thus, he was aware of my disadvantages that I always included redundant words depicting something unrelated with the topic. Due to such prior exposure, he warned me about this problem during office hours, recommending that I should present more personal ideas in the article. Following his guidance, I corrected my defects and involve as many individual views as possible, which helped me to earn an “Excellent” in his course.
Secondly, being exposed to the professors before enables students to keep up with the pace of the course. In fact, every professor has distinguished teaching methods. In other words, students who are not exposed to such method before have to spend time on adapting it. In contrast, students who have prior experiences can be more adaptive to the course and thus keep up with the pace of professors. Take myself, an ordinary university student, as an example, when I was a freshman, I select a course named Probability taught by my familiar professor, whom had taught me Liner Algebra before. Through the Liner Algebra, I was aware that he preferred to include some knowledge outside of our textbooks, which required us to do some extensive reading of other materials. In order to keep up the pace with him, before the class usually did I read other books like Time Series, Future contract and Derivatives, and so on. In this case, I can always understand the key points in his lecture.
In conclusion, the courses taught by our familiar professors should be prioritized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , familiar
...am familiar with. First and foremost,familiar professor can provide us with construct...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fore have to spend time on adapting it. In contrast, students who have prior exper...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tand the key points in his lecture. In conclusion, the courses taught by our f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2505.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18633540373 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91757142786 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6843227637 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.863636364 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9545454545 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207268495481 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615642402048 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483605650035 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139301280045 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406344215365 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.