Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
In every semester, university students are required to register for compulsory courses and optional courses, which enables them to meet different professors in each course. An undeniable fact is that encountering a new professor can furnish students a sense of refreshment, which mislead some people to generate the idea that choosing the courses taught by unknown professor is a desirable option. However, this idea suffers from both logical and factual fallacies. As far as academic performance and the pace of course are concerned, I will give a priority to courses taught by my familiar professor.
First and foremost, choosing the familiar professor can ensure better academic performance by providing us instructive advice on academy. As a matter of fact, familiar professor can know us better through the prior exposure by grading our assignments, watching our previous presentations, resolving our puzzle in class during office hours and so on. Such exposure makes the professor better get insight into our strengths and limitations. As a result, they can offer us valuable suggestions in the new course’s project. My personal experience can be a compelling example of this. The last time when I registered for a course named Artistic Aesthetics, I found that the professor happened to teach me before in a course named Literature Writing. Due to the prior experience, the professor knew that although I could write a well-organized paper, sometimes I just included unnecessary details in my paper, which made it long-winded. Therefore, the next time I went to his office for some help with my new course’s project, he told me about this problem and encouraged me to prevent it in the project. Following his guidance, I deleted all the redundant portions and only included my personal views about a specific artifacts. Thanks to his instructive advice, I finally got an “Excellent” in this course.
Second, being exposed to the professor before enables students to keep pace with the course. In fact, different professors have their own teaching styles and methods. In other words, students who register for their courses for the first time have to spend time on adapting their courses. Sometimes they will feel uneasy with it so that they might lag far behind other students. In contrast, students who are familiar with the professor are more adaptive to their teaching styles so that they can keep pace with the professor easily. Take myself, an ordinary student, as an example. When I was a freshman, I selected one course named Probability that was taught by the one whom had taught me Liner Algebra before. Due to the prior experiences, I was aware that he preferred to include some knowledge outside of our textbooks so that I always read associated textbooks to make preparations before the class, which made it easier for me to have a good command of what he taught in the lecture. Had it not been the previous exposure, I would feel uncomfortable and puzzled in his course.
In conclusion, the courses taught by familiar professors should be prioritized for the sake of students themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1214, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'artifact'?
Suggestion: artifact
...uded my personal views about a specific artifacts. Thanks to his instructive advice, I fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed for the sake of students themselves.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, of course, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2619.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13529411765 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91362322677 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488235294118 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0382898611 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216770292965 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606159072097 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366826171187 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136423778303 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469514717262 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.