You are about to choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you choose?
(1) One professor was voted most popular in a survey of students about their teachers
(2) One professor has just been given an award for outstanding research.
There are abundant types of professors in each university. This will raise the question of whether one professor who was voted most popular in a survey of students about their teachers is a better choice than the others. In my opinion, I take the position that I will choose the professor who was voted most popular in a survey.
First of all, the professor who was voted most popular in a survey could have an extraordinary teaching quality based on the survey of students. Take my previous experience as an example. When I was an undergraduate, I majored in computer science having diverse sorts of courses, such as data structure or algorithms. Of them, my favorite course was algorithms because the professor utilized an intriguing method to guide students, such as making some hilarious videos to illustrate these algorithm principles. Thus, the students of this class could always fully absorb the course material because of these interesting teaching approaches. In contrast, if we had chosen to take the class instructed by other professors, we might not have been able to obtain this knowledge deeply.
Second, the professor who was voted most popular in a survey might be willing to help students stuck in some difficult situation. For instance, when I was a freshman, I once took a course named basic programming, and I couldn’t afford an efficient computer then. Thus, I decided to write an E-mail to the professor and require him for assistance. Fortunately, he permitted me to exploit the computer in his laboratory, therefore, I could accomplish my assignments in time because of his aid. Moreover, in that semester, there was an intelligent robot project which needed a good deal of equipment to develop, like a highly efficient computer. He also made the students manipulate these instruments in his laboratory to achieve a variety of intelligent robot projects. With his help, we could receive lots of greatly pragmatic experiences in his course because of his active assistance. By contrast, if we had decided to take the class guided by other professors, we might not have been capable of having this precious opportunity to operate these advanced devices.
To sum up, these are the two reasons why I will choose the professor who was voted most popular in a survey of students about their teachers. On one hand, we could learn lots of professional knowledge more productively. On the other hand, we could also have a few chances to utilize these high-tech instruments.
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 58
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 66
- Is it better to spend money on traveling and vacations or to save money for the future 76
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...ors in each university. This will raise the question of whether one professor who was voted most popula...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in contrast, of course, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04589371981 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90798484832 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0721930832 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.45 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151918555258 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054973729174 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596356629755 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116730746044 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470394860604 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.