You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would. you choose? Why?
-One professor was voted most popular in a survey of students about their teachers.
-One professor has just been given an award for outstanding research.
When students register for classes, it is not uncommon that the professors who teach this class might be unknown. Students may find information about professors from the university website or other students. However, such information might not be inclusive. Thus, the ability of utilizing limited information about the professors to register for right classes is of great importance. From my perspective, I will choose the course taught by the professor who was voted most popular in a survey of students about their teachers.
First, I can gain more from courses taught those popular professor. As a matter of fact, the reasons why these professors are widely recognizable between student might lie in their personalities, attitudes to students, teaching methods and other aspects. Thus, students’ feedback about the professors might be objective, which can allow me to choose the right class. From their class, not only do I assimilate knowledge but also I can learn something that makes those professors so widely popular between students. Last semester I chose select one class named “behavior economics” which was taught by the most popular professor of the university. After having his class, I was really fascinated by his class because he could use some examples to vividly illustrate the professional term and use some conjunctions to make his speaking sounds logically. Also, he was really helpful, always offering students help whenever we asked for help. From his courses, I not only acquired knowledge but also learned some speaking skills and ways of treating others.
Second, the courses taught by professors who are given outstanding research may not satisfy students’ expectations or requirements. Although the professor is rewarded for their outstanding research, it does mean that his or her courses is fascinating or educational. In other words, the ability of doing academic activities well has nothing to do with the quality of courses. In this case, registered students might feel upset about courses since it can not fulfill their expectations. My personal experience can shed more light on this. Last time I just registered a class taught by a professor who just posted his outstanding research on the most well-known paper and I chose his class because of this reality. However, the professor was not as proficient in teaching students as doing academic research, always reading the PPT line by line and never assigning any homework or group work for us, which made his class boring. Eventually, because of less energy to learn on his class and less opportunities to solidify my command of knowledge, I failed to acquire something useful and even get a “F” in his class.
In conclusion, it is recommended that when it comes to choose a professor, the professor who is popular among students should be considered since it can ensure their courses’ quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 538, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to select'
Suggestion: to select
...between students. Last semester I chose select one class named “behavior economics” wh...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 989, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...f less energy to learn on his class and less opportunities to solidify my command of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, of course, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25161290323 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88495725774 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49247311828 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9245923424 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1363636364 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199827164324 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771261663861 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056906712519 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159044134985 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049010264608 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.