In your opinion, which of the following strategies is the best way for a student to prepare for a successful career?
Studying specific academic subjects
Taking a part-time job
Getting to know other students
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Student life is a very sensitive stage of life. One correct decision, our life becomes piece of cake and one wrong decision, life becomes messed up. If you ask me, I think students can have wonderful career by studying specific academic subjects than by getting a job or consulting other students.
To begin with, taking up course on specific subjects make student skilled in that sector and they can utilize their knowledge in the career development. For instance, after our high school, one of my friends opted for engineering course. He studied rigorously for four years and now he is a skilled bridge designer. Recently, he has been offered a job in a multinational company. On the contrary, I opted for a general course of education and this has made me jack of all trades and master of none.
Secondly, focusing on a specific subject helps students narrow down their job preference and make themselves suitable for the job. For example Stephen Hawking, who chose physics after high school, started searching for the opportunities in the physics sector. He was able to contribute greatly in the sector of quantum physics, all because of his focus and dedication on it specifically. Furthermore, we can take the example of Michael Jackson, who focused solely on music and was thus able to mark himself as a landmark on the music industry of world.
Lastly, student life is certainly time for some serious study not for job or increasing contacts. While some part time jobs and expanding the friend list have immediate benefits, they do not ensure successful career. Part time jobs take up great amount of time of students, which leads to the disruption of their academic life and having many friends also leads to time loss. As time and tide waits for none, recognising the best time for doing things is very necessary and students should indulge themselves in study rather than other jobs.
To sum up, taking up specific course is best option for students as it leads to skill development for future jobs and also to make themselves suitable for the job. Being involved in jobs and increasing a friend circle although has some short term benefits, are not suitable for life long.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-03 | lilyy | 83 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | ankitapatel | 60 | view |
- Government should focus it's attention in immediate problem rather than anticipated problems of future. 58
- Music talents are recognized only after they are dead. 50
- Government should provide free college and university education to all the students. 62
- College students should base their choice of field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... job or increasing contacts. While some part time jobs and expanding the friend list have...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: Part-time
..., they do not ensure successful career. Part time jobs take up great amount of time of st...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 38, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
... To sum up, taking up specific course is best option for students as it leads to skil...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nefits, are not suitable for life long.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89544235925 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58490645971 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536193029491 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.920942459 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260626311864 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865667944088 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637008330917 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149686151018 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524177679192 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.