About the mysterious music instrument in ancient greek

Essay topics:

About the mysterious music instrument in ancient greek.

The reading explains how the instrument within the ancient time was mysterious. Their sounding and way of playing are still mysterious. However, the lecturer rebukes this opinion mentioned in the reading by saying that many archaeologist has made research and study and found ways to recreate the instrument and produce similar sound .
The reading mentioned that the Lyre which was a stringed instrument is a great puzzle as the sound is very much ornate.But, its replicas produce simple sound. However the lecturer disagrees and mentioned that the archaeologist has found information about the way to recreate the same music as made during the ancient era. Also, he mentioned that the lyre produces an interesting music by manipulating the sound and making it rich in sound and music which can be recreated by modifying the instrument sound.
Likewise, the author claims that the aulos consists of inexplicable origin, Usage of two instrument in the aulos is still considered very strange. But, the lecturer gives different opinion regarding the aulos. He states that aulos is originally made of single flute instrument. But, in order to add strength to the musical sound, another flute is added ,making it two flute instrument.
So, the lecturer explains from those two instrument reasoning that ancient greek instrument can be recreated by taking in account the archaeological research and findings. Hence, such ancient instrument recreation is no longer a mystery ,that contradicts the reading paragraph which considered such instrument as strange and sound produced from them, difficult to recreate.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-03 YasamanEsml 80 view
2023-07-25 Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya 3 view
2023-07-03 theprasad 70 view
2023-06-11 Vivian Chang 3 view
2023-06-09 Zmx_6 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun archaeologist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many archaeologists'.
Suggestion: many archaeologists
...mentioned in the reading by saying that many archaeologist has made research and study and found w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the instrument and produce similar sound . The reading mentioned that the Lyre wh...
^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...puzzle as the sound is very much ornate.But, its replicas produce simple sound. How...
^^^
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...But, its replicas produce simple sound. However the lecturer disagrees and mentioned th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'instrument' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'instruments'.
Suggestion: instruments
...ts of inexplicable origin, Usage of two instrument in the aulos is still considered very s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he musical sound, another flute is added ,making it two flute instrument. So, th...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'instrument' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'instruments'.
Suggestion: instruments
...her flute is added ,making it two flute instrument. So, the lecturer explains from those...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rument recreation is no longer a mystery ,that contradicts the reading paragraph w...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83850061165 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515873015873 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0180131863 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300920106334 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103892145528 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735048357453 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17167412667 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711352143225 0.0443174109184 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.