According the reading passage, the author demonstrates three theories about what could have caused the odd sounds underwater. However, the professor argues that there are problems with each theory in the article.
First of all, the author states that the strange noises were the calls of orca whales, which inhabited the area where the submarines were picking up the bizarre noises. The lecturer challenges this theory and points out that whales are unlikely who made this noises because whales lived near the surface of the ocean. On the contrary, the submarine was in deep ocean where it detected the weird noises.
Secondly, the writer claims that the sounds were made by giant squid, which are live deep in the ocean. The writer goes on to say that the sonar did not detected them because squid have soft bodies with no skeleton. On the other hand, the speaker refutes that the strange sounds begun from 1960s and ended at 1980s, while the squid are always live in the sea. Therefore, this theory could not explain the sudden start and stop of the sounds.
Finally, the passage suggests that the sounds came from other country's military submarines, which used a kind of technology specifically designed to make them undetectable by sonar. In contrast, the professor notes that submarines could not change direction quickly. What't more, there is no evidence shows the engine noises of the machines, but no submarine could as quiet as that now.
According the reading passage, the author demonstrates three theories about what could have caused the odd sounds underwater. However, the professor argues that there are problems with each theory in the article.
First of all, the author states that the strange noises were the calls of orca whales, which inhabited the area where the submarines were picking up the bizarre noises. The lecturer challenges this theory and points out that whales are unlikely who made this noises because whales lived near the surface of the ocean. On the contrary, the submarine was in deep ocean where it detected the weird noises.
Secondly, the writer claims that the sounds were made by giant squid, which are live deep in the ocean. The writer goes on to say that the sonar did not detected them because squid have soft bodies with no skeleton. On the other hand, the speaker refutes that the strange sounds begun from 1960s and ended at 1980s, while the squid are always live in the sea. Therefore, this theory could not explain the sudden start and stop of the sounds.
Finally, the passage suggests that the sounds came from other country's military submarines, which used a kind of technology specifically designed to make them undetectable by sonar. In contrast, the professor notes that submarines could not change direction quickly. What't more, there is no evidence shows the engine noises of the machines, but no submarine could as quiet as that now.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-07 | Junjie Yue | 70 | view |
- debating if developing various skills can be more helpful for career 70
- Most times we think the people who are taking in charge can decide the future of our society while young people who have less power have little influence to the world On the contrary I hold the firm belief that young people are having strong influence to 73
- creative 80
- With the rapid development of the Internet people have more accesses and resources to the private life of famous entertainers and athletes and many people enjoy the anecdotes of celebrities As far as I am concerned celebrities need more privacy than they 80
- According to the reading passage we know that there are three different theories about how agnostid could have lived However the lecture refutes these three ideas one by one with strong arguments First the writer demonstrates a theory that agnostids are f 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'detect'
Suggestion: detect
...r goes on to say that the sonar did not detected them because squid have soft bodies wit...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in contrast, kind of, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99176954733 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29617091859 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9148733689 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.083333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325460330192 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114067571927 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150482406976 0.0662205650399 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230038119015 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.242011783148 0.0443174109184 546% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.