creative
There is no doubt that the development of technology is rapidly, and this has huge influence on the creativity of children. Some people hold the opinion that children are less creative than the past since they have less trouble in daily life. I definitely disagree with this idea, and I will illustrate the reason why I fell this way in the subsequent passage.
First and foremost, nowadays children acquire more knowledge than the past, and knowledge is the foundation of creativity. Creativity can not run out automatically from a blank brain. The experiences of some new schools are compelling examples. In British, some schools use advanced high-tech machines in school to help students doing their own experiments. Students in these school did so many inventions because they are in a creativity environment In contrast, it is hard for students in the past have the environment for innovation.
Secondly, our society is changing faster and faster, so this is a chance for creating new and fantasy things. When you stay in a stable and unchanged time as the past, it is unlikely for everyone to make some different. On the contrary, children in present are almost forced to make changes and development, for the environment which they are live in is changing everyday. For example, when I was young, the standard of an excellent student is only finishing homework on time. However, my nephew are obligated to do presentations, play the instruments and even take robots clubs. It is obvious children are stimulated by various kinds of things like my nephew will be more creative.
Last but not least, children nowadays have more financial support for their innovation. We can not deny that creativity has cost sometimes. To be more specific, many children who should do somethings big lack the access to the resources because their family could not give some financial help to them. For instance, my uncle gave up his dream of invent electronic devices when he was a little boy because the basic equipment for innovation is too expensive for him. Even though many people still in poverty, most families are richer than the past.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that children nowadays are more creative than the past because of above-mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | sara.ana | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | aaronahmed | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 66 | view |
- It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another 88
- debating if developing various skills can be more helpful for career 70
- Nowadays an increasing number of citizens are discussing the recent launch of the Shenzhou carrier rocket While there are some people who claim that this kind of launch is a waste of time or energy because it could not bring any benefit to citizens I hold 90
- According the reading passage the author demonstrates three theories about what could have caused the odd sounds underwater However the professor argues that there are problems with each theory in the article First of all the author states that the strang 70
- With the rapid development of the Internet people have more accesses and resources to the private life of famous entertainers and athletes and many people enjoy the anecdotes of celebrities As far as I am concerned celebrities need more privacy than they 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ment which they are live in is changing everyday. For example, when I was young, the sta...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.048 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82086952709 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557333333333 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4296275779 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.65 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166776948846 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652905853668 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104073221157 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124835808259 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785134321228 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.