The reading and the lecture are both about the advantages of solar energy. The author of the reading passage feels that there are three explanations for the merits of using solar energy. However, the lecturer challenges these points. He is of the opinion that these reasons are faulty.
To begin with, the author asserts that using solar energy can lessen the usages of fossil fuels and avoid the energy of overproduction as the source of it is non-renewable. On the other hand, this concept is refuted by the lecturer which suggests that fossil fuels have to be used in order to produce solar panels. Additionally, he says that the energy produced will outweigh the amount of energy made.
Another point the article puts on emphasis in terms of health is that using solar energy can eliminate the emission of harmful chemicals as it declines the usage of fossil fuels. In opposition, the professor contends this by saying that solar energy is not only clean but it can regulate how much a person uses the energy which saves their money as well.
Finally, in contrast to the reading passage's claim that the solar panel can live for about thirty years even though the price is cheap, it is accentuated in the lecture that a large amount of energy obtained can be sold to various corporations. Besides, he mentions that the cost of maintenance could be cover-up by the tax incentives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, so, well, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82426778243 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50672665184 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535564853556 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6312359215 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.818181818 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303817571369 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111110361033 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845711372995 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181456010536 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921497569169 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.