Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the new eco-friendly procedure done by the wood companies in order to achieve eco-certificate. While the reading explains that Americans are not likely to be the same, the lecture refutes all the points made by the author using its own reasons and explanations.
To begin with, the passage claims that buyers generally do not place much trusty in advertisements as a myriad of US products are labels as 'new' or 'improved'. The lecture, on the other hand, rebuts this opinion by stating that Americans do believe in private corporation's certificate which has an international reputation.
Furthermore, the author of the article mentions that eco-certification will cost more money than the certificate that is not certified which most Americans would choose not to do. However, the professor argues that people will only decide whether to buy or not if the price is 5 percent higher.
Finally, the last point in the article states that American wood companies will not keep up with the rest of the world since they do not sell their products abroad. So it would not make any sense for them. According to the professor, the company should be more alerted to foreign competition. He notes that consumers are likely to follow their companies for eco-certification.
In conclusion, the reading passage mentions three different ideas of why the wood companies in the United States would not benefit from eco-friendly steps. The lecture opposes all of the points using its own reasons and evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eco-friendly steps. The lecture opposes all of the points using its own reasons and eviden...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12648221344 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94681991272 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581027667984 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8193894171 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.083333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21413190876 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070429315585 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059267405655 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110839907234 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182304154122 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.