Although the sale of rhinoceros horns is illegal worldwide, rhinoceroses (Rhinos) are commonly poached (hunted illegally) for their horns, which can be sold for tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram. Rhino horns are so valuable that one type of rhino is already extinct because poachers killed too many of them. All rhinos may soon become extinct unless something is done to help save them. Several ideas have been suggested
The first idea is for wildlife experts to “dehorn" Rhinos living in the wild. Dehorning means removing the horns of living rhinos to make them less attractive to poachers Horns can be removed without hurting the animals if medical equipment and drugs to calm the animals are used When this strategy was tried on a small scale in the early 1990s; none of the rhinos dehorned at the time were killed by poachers.
The second possibility is to educate consumers. The majority of rhino horn sold is used in medicines Although rhino horn is believed to have health benefits, this belief has no scientific foundation Rhino horn consists almost entirely of keratin, the same material found in human hair and nails. Keratin has no known health value. Educating consumers about keratin could greatly decrease the demand for rhino horn
The third possibility is to legalize government sales of rhino horn. Some governments have large amounts of horn, taken from poachers they have arrested This horn is often kept in storage. However, if government sales were legal, large quantities of horn that governments already have could be sold at very low prices Poachers kill rhinos because consumers pay high prices for their horns If governments started selling cheap rhino horn, rhino poaching would no longer be profitable and would probably stop, at least for a while. That might help endangered rhino populations to recover.
Both the reading passage and the listening discuss the ideas to save rhinos. The former argues that there are three ways that can be adopted in order to save the rhinos, but the latter contradicts each of these points.
First of all, the author of the reading passage claims that removing the horns of Rhonos living in the wild could help to save the life of Rhinos. Notwithstanding, the lecturer contends that this idea is not practicle since in order to remove the horns, we first catch the wild Rhilnos and prepare them for surgery. The lecturer thinks that even if there is enough money to catch Rhinos and perform surgery, it will reduce the chance of wild Rhino's survival since horns help Rhinos to break food and protect their young child from other wild animals.
Second of all, the writer of the reading passage states that educating consumers will help to save Rhinos. Nevertheless, the audio maintains that it is unlikely to be effective because of long held cultural belief. He thinks that, it would likely to work if there were no earlier beliefs about the utility of Rhino's horns, but earlier preconceived belief makes it unlikely to be succeed.
Third of all, the reading passage declares that legalizing government sales of rhino horn would save Rhino. Nonetheless, the listening avers that this idea is upredictable because if government starts selling of Rhino horns, it will increase the demand of horns, as a result the price will go up and Pochers will be encouraged to kill even more Rhinos.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir young child from other wild animals. Second of all, the writer of the reading...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, third, as to, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85769230769 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40013251607 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8269817423 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.3 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173404141142 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684556374098 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738304329252 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984565357603 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586631656952 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.