Altruism

Essay topics:

Altruism

In the set of material, writer state about the altruism, it means animal sacrifices his own interest for other animal. Writer gives two examples of altruism. Instead of that in listening section professor mentions about there are not benefits of that animal that sacrifices his interest.

Firstly, in reading passage writer gives the example of humans act like shearing food with strangers and, the donation of organs to the family members or a complete strangers such act of is called altruism. However in the lecture professor state about there is no any kind of benefit to the donor from society of the organs receiving family.

Secondly, writer state in passage, many species of animals is willing to sacrifice their food for other members. The meerkat, an individual acts as a sentinel, meerkat sees a predator whose are danger for the group of meerkat. The meerkat who sees a predator he goes back without eating food, he get nothing bug still he is giving alarm to the other member of group. Instead of that in listening section, professor tells about sometime this meerkat lost their life for the other member of group. They don’t get anything.

In conclusion, Altruism is the process of sacrificing own interest for other member of group of animals. Many animals are sacrifice their life for other but they couldn't get anything from them.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-01 IshaanN04 60 view
2023-04-17 Yam Kumar Oli 35 view
2023-04-17 Yam Kumar Oli 52 view
2023-03-14 Anurag96 80 view
2023-03-14 Anurag96 3 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the set of material, writer state abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imal that sacrifices his interest. Firstly, in reading passage writer gives...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'stranger'?
Suggestion: stranger
...ans to the family members or a complete strangers such act of is called altruism. However...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rangers such act of is called altruism. However in the lecture professor state about th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... lecture professor state about there is no any kind of benefit to the donor from s...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty of the organs receiving family. Secondly, writer state in passage, many ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 313, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...or he goes back without eating food, he get nothing bug still he is giving alarm to...
^^^
Line 9, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of group. They don't get anything. In conclusion, Altruism ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...sacrifice their life for other but they couldnt get anything from them.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03964757709 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45610418099 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541850220264 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3781102196 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141753429867 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730967991334 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111696454015 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114815247611 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776439416604 0.0443174109184 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.