The author of the reading believes that the main reason why sea otters have disappeared is pollution. However, the lecturer states that the main reason for the reduction in the number of sea otters comes from hunting.
The author of the reading believes that the main reason why sea otters have disappeared is the pollution situation. However, the lecturer states that the main reason of reduction in number of sea otters comes from the other end, hunting. She uses the following evidence to indicate that it is quite possible that the main reason of reduction in number of sea otters is hunting instead of pollution.
First of all, the professor posits that the theory around the pollution issues is weakened because there are no dead otters anywhere around the water. On one hand the evidence concerning that nobody can find a dead otter weakened the argument of the author, on the other hand this evidence strengthens the hunting theory. The lack of dead sea otters demonstrates evidence against the pollution factors.
Secondly, the lecturer posits that the number of other mammals such as whales has also decreased, in addition she states that the sea whale is the main source of nutrition for orcas, known as killer whales. Furthermore she pays our attention on the fact that human beings are also responsible for the decrease in population of otters through fishing activities. In terms of decreased population of the main food source of the orcas, they try to find alternative sources of food and begin hunting smaller mammals, such as sea lions and seals. However the reading contends that the decrease in other sea mammals points to environmental pollution, since it should affect the entire sea ecosystem rather than a single species.
Finally, by stating the inability of orcas to reach otters in such locations as shallows, where population of otters did not decrease that time, she again bolsters the idea of hunting over pollution. To demonstrate this she points to the fact that there is no adverse change of population of otters in unreachable to orcas locations. On the other hand, the author of the reading states that the ocean currents could create uneven distribution of pollutants along the coast, which could be an alternative explanation survival of otters in unreachable to killer whales locations.
- Whereas the author of the reading says that these television appearance is of a great benefit to everyone the lecture cast doubts on the main points made in the reading providing three reasons 76
- As the population grows the number of cars goes up Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- While the reading believes that the sea otters are disappearing because of environmental pollution the lecturer thinks that predation is the main reason for the sea otter s decline 68
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 90
- The article states pollution is the main reason for the decline in sea otter population whereas the lecture suggests that predation is the major factor 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...in reason of reduction in number of sea otters comes from the other end, hunting. She ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...tion for orcas, known as killer whales. Furthermore she pays our attention on the fact that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...r mammals, such as sea lions and seals. However the reading contends that the decrease ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, then, as to, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.01324503311 459% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06034482759 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62850939374 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474137931034 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3152120358 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.461538462 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506549255828 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198112991927 0.0996497079465 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179599647406 0.0662205650399 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319363772825 0.162205337803 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.250551591273 0.0443174109184 565% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.