birds crash into transparent glasses
The reading presents some possible solutions to prevent harm to wild birds when they try to fly through the lass windows. The professor, however, challenges the ideas made by the passage and refutes them.
The first solution made by the author is to replace th etransparent glasses with one-way glass which is transparent in just one direction. To combact this suggestion, the lecturer proposes that one-way glass acts like a mirror which make the problem worse, because it reflects the sky and birds fly into that window, since they cannot distinguish the sky with that glass.
Furthermore, the writer brings up the idea that regular glasses can be painted with colorful lines or other designs like thin stripes, which enables people to see outside of the room through the openings. The speaker, on the other hand, posits that it should be taken into acount that the birds perceive those openings as hole through which they can fly, unless the holes are extremely small which make the room inside the window dark.
As another feasible solution, the article asserts that an artificial magnetic field could be generated to guide bird away from the buildings. Conversely, the lecturer highlight that birds utilize their magnetic ability for navigation during long distances. It is not used for going from one side of the city to other side. In this case, the lights and their eyes assist the birds to find their way.
- workers are more satisfied when they have different types of tasks. 70
- famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have much more privacy than they have. 66
- It is more enjoyable to have a job when you work only three days a week for long hours than have a job when you work five days a week for shorter hours? 60
- tpo 36 3
- Edmontosaurus' migration 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...made by the passage and refutes them. The first solution made by the author is to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34155407863 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63025210084 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0894237576 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234718109234 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766649991326 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615267792119 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122862456985 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797332097172 0.0443174109184 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.