communal online encyclopedias
The passage provides three reasons to explain the problems communal online encyclopedias have, and simultaneously, prove why they are not as valuable as traditional, printed encyclopedias. The lecturer however, provides counterpoints to oppose the criticisms presented in the passage.
The first point in the passage states that some entries in communal online encyclopedias are not written by experts, which may cause inaccuracy in those encyclopedias. On the other hand, the lecturer points out that no encyclopedia is perfectly accurate. The thing that matters is how quickly the mistakes that the writers made can be corrected. On that note, online encyclopedias are better than traditional ones, due to the fact that editors can revise the inaccurate content quickly.
Secondly, as a refutation to the point about hackers intentionally intruding in the articles from the encyclopedias, the lecturer says that online encyclopedias have certain functions that protect their articles from the hackers, or unscrupulous users. Lots of passages are presented with the “read-only” format, which cannot be revised. In addition, special editors now guard the articles to ensure nobody eliminates important details in the encyclopedias. Therefore, the second point is proved wrong by the scrutiny of the lecturer.
Last but not least, the passage tells us that online encyclopedias give equal space to articles on different, serious topics, which creates false impressions about which information is important. The lecturer deals with this point by giving us the fact that it is a strength to include all kinds of subjects in the articles. The diversity of topics reflects the diversity of people’s interests. In contrast, traditional encyclopedias have not much space, so editors of this type don’t always consider people’s interests onto account. This furtherly contributes to the opinion of the lecturer.
In conclusion, the counterpoints and evidence provided in the lecture efficiently refutes the disadvantages of online encyclopedias presented in the passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
- dinosaurs 75
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion B 90
- Dinosaurs 68
- 123123 11
- Which of the following measures would make a city safer Hiring more police officers and getting them properly trained to serve the public Increasing the number of rehab facilities to help people quit using illegal drugs Improving educational facilities to 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...riticisms presented in the passage. The first point in the passage states that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72903225806 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23011969701 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8392949412 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330433481432 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093514665669 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109459234057 0.0662205650399 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198114047544 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865839370928 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.