Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Choosing an academic subject is always a challenging and confusing task as it may define our prospective career. Many students thinks that specializing in a specific subject is better and they cite having deep and, specialized knowledge is good for future for their argument. However, I disagree with this and strongly believe that having broad knowledge of many academic subjects is much better. I will explain my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, in today’s world, companies, universities or even individuals are money oriented. In order to save money everyone wants to reduce usage of human resources as much they can. My own example is well suited for this case. After completing my master, I was interviewing for various research projects. I got a acceptance call from a professor who congratulate me and told me that they preferred me over other candidates because I knew about water analysis as well as remote sensing. It made more sense for them to take a single student for both the task and the save money for better instruments and sampling trips. If I have not had the working experience in both the fields, I would have not gotten that job either. Because of this, I think that it is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects.
Secondly, mostly in academia, almost everything is now interdisciplinary. A professor specializing in environmental sciences may work in circular economy and have more success in academic career. For example, one of my professor who was specialized in field monitoring of glaciers, was learning how to use remote sensing as many times weather make it very hard to visit glacier, thus hindering research progress. By doing so, he could monitor and study glacier in winters as well, when it is impossible to go there and conduct field work. So it is very important to have a broad knowledge of many academic subject because it prepare us for better career and pave ways for possible collaboration with other fields which is very important.
To conclude, it is a very complex topic to decide whether someone should have a broad knowledge or specialized in a subjects. However, I contend that it is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subject for above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'think'.
Suggestion: think
...e our prospective career. Many students thinks that specializing in a specific subject...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng for various research projects. I got a acceptance call from a professor who co...
^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prepares'?
Suggestion: prepares
...dge of many academic subject because it prepare us for better career and pave ways for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a subject' or simply 'subjects'?
Suggestion: a subject; subjects
...ave a broad knowledge or specialized in a subjects. However, I contend that it is better t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 378.0 270.72406181 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95502645503 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87675027937 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 145.348785872 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 419.366225166 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6082361996 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5789473684 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304829572189 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958376252106 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101581010749 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221387964353 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110965896068 0.0443174109184 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.