painting of Jane Austen
The article discusses the painting of one of the most famous English novalist, Jane Austen. More specifically, in regards to the passage, writer thinks that recently founded and, professionally painted portrait of a teenage girl is of Jane Austen. In listening passage, the lecturer points out that the claim made in reading are not true and the evidence does not convince that the painting is of Jane Austen and this claim is questionable.
First and foremost, the write made claim that the later founded painting was endorsed by her family to use for her written letter to publish. Because for more then a centure, her family is endorsing the portrait, it belongs to Jane Austen. The lecturer, however disagrees and firmly state that wehn her family gave permission to use portrait, Jane Austen was already for 70 years. So in reality, her family has never seen her and thus it does not prove the theory that the painting of teenage girl is of Jane Austen.
The passage also state that the face and other features of teenage girl resembles to the painting of cassandra, her sister who drew her adult sister. It further claims that thiugh there are difference in age of Jane Austen in both the paintings, the facial similarity depicys that the teenage girl is Jane Austan. Of course, though, the lecturer does not believe to this and explain that because here family is large, there is possibility that the teenage girl in the painting may refers to one of her cousin. Even expert believe that it was her distant niece.
Finally, the writer states that the painting style match to Ozias Humphery, who was active in the period, when Jane Austen was a teenage girl which further. The professor whereas rebuts this argument. According to him, although the painting style refers to Ozias, it was actually drawn by a London painter called William, who start selling his painting when Jane was 27 years old. So the girl in the painting can not Jane Austen.
To sum up, both the writer and lecturer have very different opinion about the recently found painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...valist, Jane Austen. More specifically, in regards to the passage, writer thinks that recentl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... is questionable. First and foremost, the write made claim that the later founded paint...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ten letter to publish. Because for more then a centure, her family is endorsing the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, whereas, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82485875706 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37771903956 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471751412429 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3690241787 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482866620979 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203971472065 0.0996497079465 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159696672014 0.0662205650399 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28634487353 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174087738982 0.0443174109184 393% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.