project and group
The article discuss the pros and cons of assigning a group to complete any task. More specifically, in regards to the writing, the writer thinks that it is the best way to approach a group as this offer various advantages. However, the lecturer is quick to point out the issues with such argument, and cite the findings of various researches to contradict the author’s claims.
First and foremost , the writer suggests that because a group offer wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills, it is more likely that a group will complete assigned task more quickly and also more creatively. The lecturer disagrees with this claim and talks about the finding of a research. According the the research, in a group project, thing move very slowly. Because it need the agreement between various members, it demands many meeting to bring every member on the same page.
The writer also claim that in a group, a single person can not be account responsible for failure and everyone is responsible for the success and failure, so the group tend to rake risk and come up with more creative solutions for the problems. Of course, though, lecturer does not agree with this claim. He explains that because individuals are not responsible for the task completion, some member does not work at all, but everyone get recognized and because of this, the hard worker feel bad.
The reading passage wraps its argument by positing that individuals have more chance to “shine” in a project and contribute more significantly, because cumulatively they can achieve more than that person could have done alone. Not surprisingly, the lecturer rebuts this statement. He continues that because few people are more influential in a group, they often prioritize their own idea and opinions, while suppressing other people’s idea. Upon failing, instead of making such people responsible, the whole team is held responsible for their actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'discusses'.
Suggestion: discusses
The article discuss the pros and cons of assigning a group ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...o complete any task. More specifically, in regards to the writing, the writer thinks that it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e author’s claims. First and foremost , the writer suggests that because a grou...
^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...is claim and talks about the finding of a research. According the the research, in a group...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ut the finding of a research. According the the research, in a group project, thing mov...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ut the finding of a research. According the the research, in a group project, thing mov...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11075949367 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71568710696 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.515345055 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225580372006 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766635242448 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102621638668 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141800460227 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629036471771 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.