golden rice

Essay topics:

golden rice

Both authors of the passage and the lecturer speak about golden rice. Their opinions on golden rice conflict with each other. The author supports the use of golden rice as a prevention for Vitamin A deficiency whereas the lecturer rebukes saying golden rice could not be as necessary as other foods.

First, The author supports the use of golden rice as it has more health benefits than normal rice as contains Vitamin A. The author supports his previous statement by saying that gold rice could help solve issues of malnutrition in areas where it is common and effectively address this problem. The lecturer refutes this statement. He tells that golden rice lack other nutrients that a child requires and can only provide 10% of the Vitamin A requirements of a child. The lecturer also adds these nutrients could be easily added to a child's nutrition by eating leafy green vegetables or mangoes and do not require golden rice to solve it.

The author concludes that by introducing golden rice into the areas where rice is already taken in daily, it could become part of a normal diet. However, The lecturer concludes the issue of malnutrition is not only of the food they take in but also includes deeper issues in the societies they live in like Public Health, Sanitation, economic power, etc...

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-07 RutvikNelluri 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user RutvikNelluri :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A requirement' or simply 'requirements'?
Suggestion: A requirement; Requirements
...and can only provide 10% of the Vitamin A requirements of a child. The lecturer also adds thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alth, Sanitation, economic power, etc...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45881587461 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0839359523 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513416375235 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.253460472531 0.0996497079465 254% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162685009481 0.0662205650399 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.388910896758 0.162205337803 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140941566695 0.0443174109184 318% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.