The lecture disputes the idea presented in the reading passage about cloud seeding as an effective approach to reduce the formation of hail and accordingly the damage to crops. The lecturer asserts that this technique does not work all the time and may cause other problems.
First of all the lecturer believes that cloud seeding may cause drought. The reading states that in laboratory experiments cloud seeding was effective to reduce hail formation by transforming it to snow. However, the lecturer states that cloud seeding has not only reduced the formation of hail, but also the formation of rain and snow. Thus, this procedure lead to dryness because of the lack of water.
The lecturer also states that we cannot generalize the effectiveness of this approach in all region. The author states that this approach was effective in reducing hail in Asia because of the interaction with pollutants in the air. However, The lecturer states that this same procedure may not hold true in some other regions where there are no pollution. For example,i n the US where the air the air is clear, this technique might be successful. He contends that pollutant particle in air may have interacted with silver iodide and cause a reduction in hail, which is not true if there are no pollutants.
Finally the lecturer argues that in local studies we observed less crops damage in vast geographic areas. According to the lecturer, this might not be solely due to the reduction in hail, but due to other natural factors that have contributed to the protection of crop, such as the use of fertilizers or pesticides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of rain and snow. Thus, this procedure lead to dryness because of the lack of w...
^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , i
...here there are no pollution. For example,i n the US where the air the air is clear...
^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the air'.
Suggestion: the air
...pollution. For example,i n the US where the air the air is clear, this technique might be succe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...t true if there are no pollutants. Finally the lecturer argues that in local studi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9594095941 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62734255126 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490774907749 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1803597701 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.384615385 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106462279992 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434248965197 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369843717309 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687963376908 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241978162634 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.