The main topic of both reading passage and lecture about strange behavior of elephants The author claims several surprising behaviors of elephants However the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions these explanation about elephants beh

Essay topics:

The main topic of both reading passage and lecture about strange behavior of elephants. The author claims several surprising behaviors of elephants. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions these explanation about elephants behaviors are misunderstanding.
First, the writer states, elephants are aware of approaching death. He elaborates on finding a lot of sites containing elephants bone near water called (elephants graveyard). This statement is challenged by professor. She illustrates, elephants need soft vegetables to eat, these type of food can find it water near there sites of habitats. Therefore, this explanation is incorrect.
Second, the author asserts, elephants can represent objects through art. which is mean, they have artistic ability to draw thing like flowers or themselve. The professor in the other hand refutes this notion. She says, when human train elephant to do some thing like hold brush, they touch their ears. Moreover, when ever elephants are given brush, their ear are touched which stimulate them to move their hand over canvas and make line with brush. But this dose not mean they draw pictures like flower or some thing else. It just line.
Finally, the author contends, elephants fear from mice. Furthermore, they do not fear from large animals like lions or tiger. The professor contradicts this point. She says, elephants not familiar with mice, but they do not fear from them. In the other word, elephant familiar with lion and tiger. In addition, when we put mice with elephants long time. Elephant will not leave place.

The main topic of both reading passage and lecture about strange behavior of elephants. The author claims several surprising behaviors of elephants. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions these explanation about elephants behaviors are misunderstanding.
First, the writer states, elephants are aware of approaching death. He elaborates on finding a lot of sites containing elephants bone near water called (elephants graveyard). This statement is challenged by professor. She illustrates, elephants need soft vegetables to eat, these type of food can find it water near there sites of habitats. Therefore, this explanation is incorrect.
Second, the author asserts, elephants can represent objects through art. which is mean, they have artistic ability to draw thing like flowers or themselves. The professor in the other hand refutes this notion. She says, when human train elephant to do some thing like hold brush, they touch their ears. Moreover, when ever elephants are given brush, their ear are touched which stimulate them to move their hand over canvas and make line with brush. But this dose not mean they draw pictures like flower or some thing else. It just line.
Finally, the author contends, elephants fear from mice. Furthermore, they do not fear from large animasl like lions or tiger. The professor contradicts this point. She says, elephats not familiar with mice, but they do not fear from them. In the other word, elephant familiar with lion and tiger. In addition, when we put mice with elephants long time. Elephant will not leave place.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-11 talelaldabous 75 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The main topic of both reading passage a...
^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this explanation' or 'these explanations'?
Suggestion: this explanation; these explanations
... on claim made in article. She mentions these explanation about elephants behaviors are misunders...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elephants'' or 'elephant's'?
Suggestion: elephants'; elephant's
...aining elephants bone near water called elephants graveyard. This statement is challenged...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'waters'?
Suggestion: waters
... to eat, these type of food can find it water near there sites of habitats. Therefore...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...ants can represent objects through art. which is mean, they have artistic ability to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...e says, when human train elephant to do some thing like hold brush, they touch their ears....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
... mean they draw pictures like flower or some thing else. It just line. Finally, the auth...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26274509804 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5868504911 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619607843137 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 3.25607064018 399% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9912313189 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.347826087 110.228320801 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.0869565217 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38871742392 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110550753379 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129882930178 0.0662205650399 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278603156464 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.273923980732 0.0443174109184 618% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.04 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.