Mandatory drinking age
The Author supports the idea of lowering the MDA in the U.S. from age of 21 to 18, while the speaker opposes this position by dismissing the Authors claims based upon responsibilities, statistic compartment to Europe and safer environment.
The Writers first argument is that young people of age 18 are legally by law recognized as an adult. They can buy cigarettes and go to the military. However, the Speaker infers that not only for buying alcohol is set mandatory age, but for gambling, adopting and owning a car also. If there are other ways, rather than buying and consuming alcohol, that can prove that person is adult, than there is no need to lower mandatory drinking age.
Not only responsibility but also statistic compared to Europe, are used by Writer as a reason for lowering the MDA. Young people in Europe can consume alcohol legally at age of 18 and Europe still has a lower decrease of traffic accidents than the U.S. N3ver would the Speaker supported such statement, remarking that the youth in Europe has been proven to be more intoxicated, which can lead to death. If the lowering the MDA can increase the death rate caused by alcohol consumption in adolescents, then this is not as good statistic as the Author claims.
If both responsibilities and the statistic are not convincing reasons to lower the MDA, the Essayist would replay upon that the young people, under the age of 21, are consuming alcohol regardless to the law in a house party's and in another unsafe environment. If they would be allowed to drink in bars, where adults are present, they would be safe from accidents. In this case, the Lecturer reveals that allowing underaged teens to drink in bars, discos, and restaurants, can motivate them to drink even more. So, if the low MDA would encourage them to drink more than the bars and discos are not as safe environment as the Essayist states.
Through contradictory arguments, the Speaker casts doubt on the validity of the Authors claims based on responsibility, statistic, and safe environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | nusybah | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- Comic 73
- Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and tjey do not change their habits. Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you preffer? Explain why. 90
- Comics 73
- Mostvexperiences in life that seemed difficult at the time became valuable lessons for the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement ? 60
- Most experiences in life that seemed difficult at the time became valuable lessons for the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...for gambling, adopting and owning a car also. If there are other ways, rather than b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rtys and in another unsafe environment. If they would be allowed to drink in bars,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88793103448 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7679962208 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2197922549 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.846153846 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230684494547 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799244124125 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805243825635 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113252359756 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108591269313 0.0443174109184 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.