Tablets in the Classroom
The Author fully suports the idea of replacing the textbooks in classroom with tablets, while the Speaker opposes this position by dismissing the Authors claims based upon the cost, health benefits and on the influence on learning.
The Writers first argument is based on the cost of textbooks. Reducing the printing of textbooks can save up to 8 billions to a government, because the ebooks cost up to 60% less. However, the Speaker implies that ebooks may be cheaper, but the implementation of such system demands purchase of softwaers and hardwares for the learning platform; Wi-Fi network needs to be established and teachers needs to be educated about this new approach of learning. If the cost of the implementation and introduction of this system costs more than printing the textbooks, then the tablets are not as economical as the Author suggested.
Not only economical but also health benifits are cited by the Writer as a good reason to introduce the tablets into schools. Heavy textbooks can cause back problems. Both of the ciropratrical exams and back pain can be avoided just by usage of tablets. Never would the Lecturer support such a statement, remaking that tablets can cause more severe health problems, such as computer vision sindrom. As there are other health problems caused by daily use of tablets, then they are not as health beneficial as the Writer had cited.
If both economical and health beneficial arguments are not convincing enough, the Essayist would replay upon the teaching experience. Tablets are great helping tool to teachers, they enrich classroom education and they make it easier for teachers to provide homework, assignments and test for students. On the other hand, the Lecturer reveals that tablets can be a distraction for students because of the variety of content: apps, games, emails for a student to focus on. So if the students would rather read emails than to pay an attention to a teacher, then he tablets are not increasing teaching experience as the Essayist predicts.
Through contradictory arguments, the Speaker casts doubt on the validity of the Authors claims centred upon economic and health benefit, and on impact on learning experience.
- Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and tjey do not change their habits. Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you preffer? Explain why. 90
- Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and tjey do not change their habits. Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you preffer? Explain why. 76
- Mostvexperiences in life that seemed difficult at the time became valuable lessons for the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement ? 60
- Comic 73
- Comics 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch system demands purchase of softwaers and hardwares for the learning platform;...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 360.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14722222222 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75640527893 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8778790981 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.533333333 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174460528661 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522639179942 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625904597993 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081048049628 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661868303556 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 63.6247240618 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.