online encyclopedias

Essay topics:

online encyclopedias

Recently, there has been a ton of debates as to online encyclopedias. More specifically, in regards to the reading, the writer puts in forth the idea that such collection of articles are not that accurate. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick in pointing out there are some serious flaws in the writers claim. In fact, the professor believes that encyclopedias are beneficial and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point made in the reading passage.

First and foremost, the author of the text states that these online articles often lack academic credentials. some professionals in the same field, however, stand in firm opposite to this claim. In the listening, for example, the lecturer claims that every article, wether on paper or online, could include mistakes. she goes on to say that even though online encyclopedias might have errors, they offer a lot and are actually easier to correct than written words.

One group of scholars, represented by the writer, think that the internet gives hackers or vandals the opportunity to easily change the informations or delete them. Of course, though, not all experts believe this is accurate and again, the speaker, specifically addresses this claim when she provides that this is already a recognized issue and several strategies are created to avoid this problems. For example some websites have special editors, who can eliminate those changes.

Finally, the author wraps his arguments by positing that such articles provide too focused and deeply developed informations, which could create a false impression. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this point by contending that not every author reflect the great interests of the reader and decide on their own which information is important to fill up the limited space. In addition she mentions that online encyclopedias have a great variety and diversity of what they offer, which she finds really amazing.

To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflict view about this topic. It is clear that they will have struggles finding common ground on this issue.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-16 TiOluwani97 87 view
2023-07-11 keisham 83 view
2023-07-06 nilav view
2023-04-05 Dat_Nguyen 70 view
2022-12-28 MotherAstronaut 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user _.Alice._ :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...nline encyclopedias. More specifically, in regards to the reading, the writer puts in forth t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ticles often lack academic credentials. some professionals in the same field, howeve...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...aper or online, could include mistakes. she goes on to say that even though online ...
^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...several strategies are created to avoid this problems. For example some websites hav...
^^^^
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ortant to fill up the limited space. In addition she mentions that online encyclopedias ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to find'.
Suggestion: to find
... is clear that they will have struggles finding common ground on this issue.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, really, so, as to, for example, in addition, in fact, of course, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70082007282 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 145.348785872 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9086043942 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17232709217 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552376906187 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872808668697 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934333341486 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808958468722 0.0443174109184 183% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.