paintings of rembrandts
The author of the reading believes that the painting of a woman's face is not dedicated to famous dutch painter portraits. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author, she holds the view that they were thinking wrong about the portrait and it was indeed related to Rembrandt.
First of all, the author suggests that the woman in the painting wore a costly fur collar which can't be afforded by a servant, and besides the painter was extremely meticulous about details while doing his job. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says the fair collar wasn't part of the original painting and it was added later to increase the value of the painting.
Secondly, the writer contends that the painter who was an expert in painting light and shadow didn't follow the rules of painting the shadow and reflect of light on the fur collar. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that as the collar was added after some time to the painting when you remove it you would notice the reflection of light and it seems to be so realistic just as the type of Rembrandts's paintings.
Finally, it is stated in the article that two pieces of wood were glued together to have one wood panel of painting while, Rembrandts used to paint on only one piece of wood. The lecturer, on the other hand, contradicts that by saying that they added one new part of the wood to the panel to paint the collar fur and the texture of the wood was the same as the wood which Rembrandt used in his self-portrait painting.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-14 | saamaan | 85 | view |
2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...painting wore a costly fur collar which cant be afforded by a servant, and besides t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...y the lecturer. He says the fair collar wasnt part of the original painting and it wa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... an expert in painting light and shadow didnt follow the rules of painting the shadow...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59778597786 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39347751828 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509225092251 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3729151929 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.444444444 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315766230639 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123404555475 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715666520647 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179248496169 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526719017851 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.