The passage and lecture are both about the advantages of team work group The author claims several advantage of group work The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He contradictes each one First the reading passage states working as a group i

Essay topics:

The passage and lecture are both about the advantages of team work group . The author claims several advantage of group work. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He contradictes each one.
First, the reading passage states, working as a group is helpful, because group of people has a wide range of ideas and knowledeges. The professor refutes this statement. He says. in team there is someone who may depend on other to finish a project and does not share with any work . He may behave as free rideng. Furthermore.
Second, the author argue that groupm work may finish their work in short time with perfect result. This argument is challenged by professor. He elaborates on, when group have many ideas, theyneed a lot of meeting to disccus everyone and decide which one better. therefore, they will take longer time to make decision.
The athor says, team members have a chance to shine. The professor in the other hand mentions, team workers may have one who is very influential member . He may effect the othwr in making decision. If his decision is corect. The success of the project will beyond to him. If his decision incorrect, the failiar of the project will be effect all team workers.

The passage and lecture are both about the advantages of team work group . The author claims several advantage of group work. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He contradictes each one.
First, the reading passage states, working as a group is helpful, because group of people has a wide range of ideas and knowledeges. The professor refutes this statement. He says. in team there is someone who may depend on other to finish a project and does not share with any work . He may behave as free rideng. Furthermore.
Second, the author argue that groupm work may finish their work in short time with perfect result. This argument is challenged by professor. He elaborates on, when group have many ideas, theyneed a lot of meeting to disccus everyone and decide which one better. therefore, they will take longer time to make decision.
The athor says, team members have a chance to shine. The professor in the other hand mentions, team workers may have one who is very influential member . He may effect the othwr in making decision. If his decision is corect. The success of the project will beyond to him. If his decision incorrect, the failiar of the project will be effect all team workers.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-14 talelaldabous 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both about t...
^^
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... about the advantages of team work group . The author claims several advantage of ...
^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advantage seems to be countable; consider using: 'several advantages'.
Suggestion: several advantages
... of team work group . The author claims several advantage of group work. The lecturer casts doubt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...claims several advantage of group work. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...fessor refutes this statement. He says. in team there is someone who may depend on...
^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...project and does not share with any work . He may behave as free rideng. Furthermo...
^^
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ny work . He may behave as free rideng. Furthermore. Second, the author argue that groupm...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...s everyone and decide which one better. therefore, they will take longer time to make dec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill take longer time to make decision. The athor says, team members have a chan...
^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... have one who is very influential member . He may effect the othwr in making decis...
^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...who is very influential member . He may effect the othwr in making decision. If his de...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ay effect the othwr in making decision. If his decision is corect. The success of ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, therefore, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78095238095 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43789033964 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1166322831 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 55.7777777778 110.228320801 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.6666666667 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459314614672 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135070890898 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188317969466 0.0662205650399 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330227653401 0.162205337803 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.322957429244 0.0443174109184 729% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.3589403974 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.26 12.2367328918 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.