The passage and lecture are both about possibilty of fying and flapping of Pterosaurs dinosaure The author claims several reasons to explain why Ptersaurs did not fly The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article and contradacts these reasons First

Essay topics:

The passage and lecture are both about possibilty of fying and flapping of Pterosaurs dinosaure. The author claims several reasons to explain why Ptersaurs did not fly. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article. and contradacts these reasons.
First, The reading passage stats, Ptersaurs were cold blooded repitles, therefore they has low metabolism and enable to produce enrgy to help their in flying. The lecturer has opposit opinion. She mentions, these type of dinosaurs had dens hair which cover their bodies, as a result, they can keep warm body tempreture. So they can have enrgy to fly.
Second, the author argues, Pterosaurs had heavy weight that would not have been able to fly. The professor in the other hand disagree with this argument. She says, althoug these species had large bones, but their bone were hallow, therefore they had light bones which enale them to fly easily.
Finally, the aother points to the large size of pterosaurs, they can not run or launch from the ground. Furthermore, fossels show that these anamils had weah legs. The professor reputs this reason. She mentions, these animals had four limbs instead of two. These lims enable them to push ground and run high enough and jump.

The passage and lecture are both about possibilty of fying and flapping of Pterosaurs dinosaure. The author claims several reasons to explain why Ptersaurs did not fly. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article. and contradacts these reasons.
First, The reading passage stats, Ptersaurs were cold blooded repitles, therefore they has low metabolism and enable to produce enrgy to help their in flying. The lecturer has opposit opinion. She mentions, these type of dinosaurs had dens hair which cover their bodies, as a result, they can keep warm body tempreture. So they can have enrgy to fly.
Second, the author argues, Pterosaurs had heavy weight that would not have been able to fly. The professor in the other hand disagree with this argument. She says, althoug these species had large bones, but their bone were hallow, therefore they had light bones which enale them to fly easily.
Finally, the aother points to the large size of pterosaurs, they can not run or launch from the ground. Furthermore, fossels show that these anamils had weah legs. The professor reputs this reason. She mentions, these animals had four limbs instead of two. These lims enable them to push ground and run high enough and jump.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-08 talelaldabous 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both about p...
^^
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s to explain why Ptersaurs did not fly. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in th...
^^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...sts doubt on claim made in the article. and contradacts these reasons. First, T...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ticle. and contradacts these reasons. First, The reading passage stats, Ptersa...
^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...e cold blooded repitles, therefore they has low metabolism and enable to produce en...
^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...cond, the author argues, Pterosaurs had heavy weight that would not have been able to fly. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...species had large bones, but their bone were hallow, therefore they had light bones ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hallowed'.
Suggestion: hallowed
...es had large bones, but their bone were hallow, therefore they had light bones which e...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bones which enale them to fly easily. Finally, the aother points to the large ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h ground and run high enough and jump.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, second, so, therefore, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98058252427 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26121903165 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645631067961 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7362878965 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.125 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.875 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324553110002 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111345738457 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138574626433 0.0662205650399 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243205505629 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.304321917544 0.0443174109184 687% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.