The passage and the lecturer argue about the danger of glass in modern architects for birds which cannot distinguish between glass and open air. The passage provides three solutions for preventing this injury, but the professor dismisses them, and explains that none of them is effective.
In the first point, the reading asserts that on way glasses should be used for windows because birds cannot see in it. The professor refutes it, and explains that the out direction of this window works like a mirror and reflects the sky and trees, so birds cannot understand it and will be injured.
In the second point, the article claims that if architects use painting in design of window, birds can distinguish it, and also people can see out with no paint parts. However the professor declares that this design include some opening parts, and the birds see them as a hole and fly through it. Also, if they are painted, and have just extremely small opening part, the inside will be too dark for people.
Finally, the passage explains that as birds have natural ability to sense the earth magnetic fields for navigating, windows should have an artificial magnetic fields. The professor opposes this point by saying that Birds use this ability for long distances such as migrating from cold country in winter to warm country, and for short distances, they use eyes and brightness of light. So it will not be effective.
The passage and the lecturer argue about the danger of glass in modern architects for birds which cannot distinguish between glass and open air. The passage provides three solutions for preventing this injury, but the professor dismisses them, and explains that none of them is effective.
In the first point, the reading asserts that on way glasses should be used for windows because birds cannot see in it. The professor refutes it, and explains that the out direction of this window works like a mirror and reflects the sky and trees, so birds cannot understand it and will be injured.
In the second point, the article claims that if architects use painting in design of window, birds can distinguish it, and also people can see out with no paint parts. However the professor declares that this design include some opening parts, and the birds see them as a hole and fly through it. Also, if they are painted, and have just extremely small opening part, the inside will be too dark for people.
Finally, the passage explains that as birds have natural ability to sense the earth magnetic fields for navigating, windows should have an artificial magnetic fields. The professor opposes this point by saying that Birds use this ability for long distances such as migrating from cold country in winter to warm country, and for short distances, they use eyes and brightness of light. So it will not be effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-13 | Kamranfar_m | 86 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 70
- The passage and the lecturer argue about the danger of glass in modern architects for birds which cannot distinguish between glass and open air. The passage provides three solutions for preventing this injury, but the professor dismisses them, and explain 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...people can see out with no paint parts. However the professor declares that this design...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'field'?
Suggestion: field
...dows should have an artificial magnetic fields. The professor opposes this point by sa...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248148148148 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.144444444444 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0723426182421 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0407407407407 0.0435111971325 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0407407407407 0.0277247811725 147% => OK
Prepositions: 0.151851851852 0.128828473217 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0296296296296 0.0370669169778 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.34681695092 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00740740740741 0.0208969081088 35% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0037037037037 0.00154638098197 240% => OK
Determiners: 0.103703703704 0.128158765124 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.037037037037 0.0158828679856 233% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0037037037037 0.0114777025283 32% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1422.0 1645.83664459 86% => OK
No of words: 241.0 271.125827815 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90041493776 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356846473029 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257261410788 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.149377593361 0.187439937562 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0912863070539 0.113142543107 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34681695092 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56846473029 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 55.9591944622 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 24.1 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2809686872 49.3711431718 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.2 132.220823453 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 0.878197800319 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 49.8261410788 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.90163934426 1.90840788429 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.654287943957 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12878996094 0.142949733639 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0649304566344 0.0787303798458 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.631087702161 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17447529896 0.139662658121 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.312380010684 0.266732575781 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218856214337 0.103435571967 212% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.393919994628 0.414875509568 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0669641156671 0.0530846634433 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.486818862011 0.40443939384 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.252243908792 0.0528353158467 477% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.