The passage states that R.Robustus was a scavenger, yet the professor says that it was a hunter
The text and the lecturer discuss the topic whether a Repenomamus robustus hunted dinosaurs. The professor doubts the ideas of the text claiming that dinosaurs were not hunted by these ancient mammal specimens. The professor opines that the text does not consider the other evidence omitted by the author of article.
First, the professor rejects the idea that small-sized mammals mentioned in the text could not eat larger animals, such as dinosaurs. The speaker challenges this idea saying that the mammal chase baby and same-sized dinosaurs.
Secondly, the speaker pinpoints that a modern hunting animal, Tasmanian Devil, also has legs positioned to the side. The professor underlines the idea that if the mentioned modern specimen can successfully hunt other animals, the same thing can do R. robustus.
Finally, the professor refutes the third point of the text stating the absence of teeth marks on eaten dinosaur`s bones as evidence of the found dinosaur be swallowed by R. robustus. However, the speaker rebuts the idea making a point that this ancient animal either swallowed, or ate dinosaurs in large parts advocating for robustus as an active hunting animal.
- Diagram shows the development of the island 73
- Some people argue children should stay in school until the age of 18 while others think that 14 years is long enough Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 80
- School administrators at an elementary school have recently decided to increase the amount of hours spent teaching kids about robotics computer programming and other elements of science and technology However they were forced to reduce the amount of hours 90
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nted by these ancient mammal specimens. The professor opines that the text does not...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 30.3222958057 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 187.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31550802139 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67398929788 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6066239905 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0689331589906 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243298764235 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342089228722 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0412067380582 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165273507981 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.