Preventing Birds from Injuries Due to Glass
Both the reading passage and lecture discuss about the measures to protect injuries to birds resulting from the use of regular class, as the building material in the modern times. While the author suggests three specific strategies to protect the harm on birds, the lecturer challenges the proposition made by author. In his opinion, the solutions will not be efficacious for several reasons which will be discussed in detail in following paragraphs.
The author, in the reading, begins by mentioning that usage of one-way glass through which only humans can see through in face of birds, will be effective. It ultimately prohibits the birds colliding with the building. The lecturer, however, confutes the claim made by author. He states that such kind of mirror will act as a mirror deteriorating the scenario former. The birds will see the reflection of their surroundings--as sky, trees, and so forth. As a result, they are highly probable to interact with the glass unknowingly. Evidently, it falsifies the authors statement.
The writer further asserts that painting the colorful stripes in the glass ensuring the visibility by the inside occupants will not entice the birds to fly towards the building. The speaker questions the writers argument by stating that these opening on the transparent glass after creating stripes will be regarded as open holes by the birds. Consequently, they will be tempted to fly through it. In contrary, if the small size of stripes is marked in the glass, it would be extremely difficult for insider dwellers to see through it; additionally, it also cause the darkness which completely jeopardizes the authors suggestion.
The reading article, finally, posits that employing magnetic field around the building will certainly deviate the birds from coming towards it, since they posses the capability to detect such fields. As opposed to articles opinion, birds generally uses such techniques in travelling to larger distances--for example, travelling from cold place to warm places, and do not use them in short distance. Specifically, they will make excellent use of eye and brightness for such shorter distances. This position is also refuted by lecture.
To summarize, the author and speaker holds opposite views on the favorability of implementation of different considerations to prevent bird from injury due to the usage of glass in buildings which will be difficult for both of them in finding common ground.
- Communal Online and Traditional Printed Encyclopedia 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much money on clothing to improve their appearance Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend money on salaries university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Voynich Manuscript 88
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...nknowingly. Evidently, it falsifies the authors statement. The writer further assert...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...the building. The speaker questions the writers argument by stating that these opening ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...o see through it; additionally, it also cause the darkness which completely jeopardiz...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rkness which completely jeopardizes the authors suggestion. The reading article, fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'article'.
Suggestion: article
...ty to detect such fields. As opposed to articles opinion, birds generally uses such tech...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in short, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 30.3222958057 211% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1373.03311258 151% => OK
No of words: 392.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29081632653 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85736150767 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 145.348785872 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 419.366225166 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.249701499 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.157894737 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237408537223 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627845256706 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829672028452 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145360527045 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101507396015 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 63.6247240618 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...nknowingly. Evidently, it falsifies the authors statement. The writer further assert...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...the building. The speaker questions the writers argument by stating that these opening ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...o see through it; additionally, it also cause the darkness which completely jeopardiz...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rkness which completely jeopardizes the authors suggestion. The reading article, fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'article'.
Suggestion: article
...ty to detect such fields. As opposed to articles opinion, birds generally uses such tech...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in short, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 30.3222958057 211% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1373.03311258 151% => OK
No of words: 392.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29081632653 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85736150767 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 145.348785872 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 419.366225166 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.249701499 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.157894737 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237408537223 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627845256706 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829672028452 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145360527045 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101507396015 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 63.6247240618 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.