Productivity and Rewards
The passage suggests that the way of increasing productivity is to usher incentives and rewards to the employees. However, the speaker contradicts this mechanism by a variety of reasons.
Firstly, the reading suggests that an external driving force in the form of rewards and incentives is needed as a sense of motivation for the employees. However, the speaker clearly states that that employees detest the system and instead wanted to be respected for their hard work.
Furthermore, the author mentions that rewards improve productivity by improving their attitude and motivation and confidence. In contrast, the speaker mentions that people feel that they are punished and are being manipulated by the greed of rewards.
In addition, the author says that it is proven by books that the rewarding mechanism will help improve productivity whereas, the speaker mentions that there is no controlled study that justifies the author’s claim. On the contrary, the speaker strengthens his side by saying that there are studies that show that rewards are counterproductive.
Lastly, the author says that structuring of rewards will guarantee optimal results. Structuring them by being accessible to employees. However, the speaker suggests that the reward system will cause the relationship between the worker and the supervisor to be detrimental by suggesting a suitable example that the worker will try to shy away the mistakes in lust of the rewards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 86 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | mnm | 63 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | monigdc | 78 | view |
- Productivity and Rewards 66
- Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number 54
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 50
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 62
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, then, whereas, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45814977974 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96894076215 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497797356828 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7512783352 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.636363636 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298878045218 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12043302387 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118585064802 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179025548636 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732840043266 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.