Professor appearances on television.
The lecturer clearly contends on the statement saying about whether or not the anyone benefits by Professors appearing on television or not. Also lecturer puts up the question that whether professor appearing on televisions is beneficial or not ? And placing a question that if they are appeared in the television then who all are affected by his/her appearance.
Firstly the lecturer states that professor by themselves are not benefitted from appearing in televisions. As television is less a source of knowledge and more a source of entertainment. Appearing on television might degrade professor being as a scholar and being more academic and might get a tagline of an entertainer. Also his/her reputations might be among their fellow professor. There can be a example where professor is attending an television session and might get ended up getting a tagline of monetary purposed professor. After his/her more appearances on televisions professor might end up attending less number of conferences, important meeting, less research work are some of the consequences.
Secondly, the lecturer contends that not only time attending the televisions is wasted, a lot of extra time such as getting ready for the shoot, takes of the camera more than one time and another lot of time is wasted attending an television meetings. Professor can be able to divert this amount of time to get involved in more number of research, to students who have doubts regarding his/her subject, and might be able to address issues regarding their own universities.
On the third note lecturer contends that public might also get benefitted whenever a professor takes sessions on television, as more and more number of things are scripted in today’s world. As televisions try to make people entertain not to give more knowledge and information to the people. As more number of topics in television are related to current topics, material background, and more in the historical backgrounds public might also get no benefits by profession appearances on the television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 75 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | 71 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems ,the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- Professor appearances on television. 73
- Younger people enjoy life more than older people do. 73
- People attend college or university for many different reasons 73
- The effectiveness of a country’s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country’s citizen. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... contends on the statement saying about whether or not the anyone benefits by Professors appea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'anyone'?
Suggestion: the; anyone
...e statement saying about whether or not the anyone benefits by Professors appearing on tel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...fessors appearing on television or not. Also lecturer puts up the question that whet...
^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ether professor appearing on televisions is beneficial or not ? And placing a que...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l are affected by his/her appearance. Firstly the lecturer states that profess...
^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... might get a tagline of an entertainer. Also his/her reputations might be among thei...
^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng their fellow professor. There can be a example where professor is attending an...
^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... a example where professor is attending an television session and might get ended ...
^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'televisions'' or 'television's'?
Suggestion: televisions'; television's
...ssor. After his/her more appearances on televisions professor might end up attending less n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...portant meeting, less research work are some of the consequences. Secondly, the lectu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...another lot of time is wasted attending an television meetings. Professor can be a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2987804878 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02467197124 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2464143459 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278669088381 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121791960324 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813069645195 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177221344102 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890083302086 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.