The reading passage and lecture are both talking about glass building material, these building may injury birds because they cannot distinguish between glass and air space. The author gives three solutions to treat this problem. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the articles. He says all these solutions are not effective.
First, the writer state, one way glass which is transparent from one side can solve this issue, the bird can understand that the glass form solid barrier and will not try to pass it. This point challenge by lecturer, he mentions, one way glass can cause light reflection and the glass look like mirror to the birds, therefore birds can see the picture of the trees and sun in the glass and try to go ahead, and will be injuryed by hitting with the glass.
Second, the lecturer suggests using colorful glass, he points on paint on the glass as a part of design of building like a stripes over the glass. The professor refutes this argument, he states, the birds still see the glass between colored stripes and try to pass them, since we need to leave very small part of glass without painting and in this case the building become very dark from inside, that way this solution is not working.
Finally, the author elaborates on a create of magnetic field to guide the birds a way from building, in the other hand, the professor sees this method is not successful, he believe that birds use magnetic field for navigation only in long distance,they use this way in migration before winter to another place, but cannot use it in the flying from one side of the city to the other.
The reading passage and lecture are both talking about glass building material, these building may injury birds because they cannot distinguish between glass and air space. The author gives three solutions to treat this problem. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the articles. He says all these solutions are not effective.
First, the writer state, one way glass which is transparent from one side can solve this issue, the bird can understand that the glass form solid barrier and will not try to pass it. This point challenge by lecturer, he mentions, one way glass can cause light reflection and the glass look like mirror to the birds, therefore birds can see the picture of the trees and sun in the glass and try to go ahead, and will be injuryed by hitting with the glass.
Second, the lecturer suggests using colorful glass, he points on paint on the glass as a part of design of building like a stripes over the glass. The professor refutes this argument, he states, the birds still see the glass between colored stripes and try to pass them, since we need to leave very small part of glass without painting and in this case the building become very dark from inside, that way this solution is not working.
Finally, the author elaborates on a create of magnetic field to guide the birds a way from building, in the other hand, the professor sees this method is not successful, he believe that birds use magnetic field for navigation only in long distance,they use this way in migration before winter to another place, but cannot use it in the flying from one side of the city to the other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-12 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about glass building material these building may injury birds because they cannot distinguish between glass and air space The author gives three solutions to treat this problem The lecture casts doubt on cl 60
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about declination of liiterature reader in these days The passage claims there are several negative effect by reducing in reading literature The lecturer in the other hand casts dout in claim made in articl 71
- Skip to main content Independent Writing Question 1 00 00 Directions You have 30 minutes to plan and write your response Typically an effective response will be 300 words at least Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A person should never 70
- The reading passage and lecture are talking about distinction which has occured to species at the end of the Triassic period The writer claims three reasons for these extinction However the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She believes non of 60
- Telling the truth is a very beautiful thing Any type of relationship should be built on honesty For example between parents and children I in this order relationship will continue and become stronger First of all if we do not telling the truth in any situ 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are both...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all these solutions are not effective First the writer state one way glass whi...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be injuryed by hitting with the glass Second the lecturer suggests using color...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that way this solution is not working Finally the author elaborates on a creat...
^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ing Finally the author elaborates on a create of magnetic field to guide the birds a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...r sees this method is not successful he believe that birds use magnetic field for navig...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55438596491 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16596693012 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519298245614 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 285.0 21.2450331126 1341% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1298.0 110.228320801 1178% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 285.0 21.698381199 1313% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 75.0 7.06452816374 1062% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477276965863 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.477276965863 0.0996497079465 479% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332483388191 0.162205337803 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.292859242389 0.0443174109184 661% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 142.5 13.3589403974 1067% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -200.88 53.8541721854 -373% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 112.1 11.0289183223 1016% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.59 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.04 8.42419426049 238% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 51.0 10.7273730684 475% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 116.0 10.498013245 1105% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 116.0 11.2008830022 1036% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.