The lecturer and the author have contrasting viewpoints about ways to prevent bird from colliding with glass building. While the author claims that there are solutions to save the birds from hitting the glass, the lecturer disputes those claim, stating that the suggested approaches by the author may not be effective. The lecturer presents three different reasons.
First the lecturer argues that replacing translucent glass with mirror glass will cause birds to see a reflection of trees and be deceived by the pictures. The author claims that replacing the glass windows with mirrors would help birds to identify the solid object is in front of them. However ,confidently, the lecturer argues that birds cannot identify the reflected images as non real. He confirm that bird would see tree reflections and be deceived thinking that they are real trees. Thus collide with it.
Moreover, the lecturer contends that birds also cannot distinguish between free air and the holes between glass paintings. The author claims that painting colorful designs on glass buildings will help birds to identify that there are solid objects in front of them and redirect their path. on the other hand, the lecturer states that birds will still fly in between the painting lines, through the painting holes . Furthermore, designers might reduce the space between drawings hopelessly thinking that they are saving the birds, but that is in vein.
Finally, the lecturer states that creating an artificial magnetic field won't redirect birds away from the building. The lecturer acknowledges that magnetic field would long distance travelling birds from colliding with the glass. However, short travelling birds will not be able to detect magnetic field since they rely purely on their sight and day brightness to see their path. As a result, such technique would be useless and ineffective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...olid object is in front of them. However ,confidently, the lecturer argues that bi...
^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'confirms'.
Suggestion: confirms
...fy the reflected images as non real. He confirm that bird would see tree reflections an...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... front of them and redirect their path. on the other hand, the lecturer states tha...
^^
Line 4, column 412, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...inting lines, through the painting holes . Furthermore, designers might reduce the...
^^
Line 4, column 542, Rule ID: IN_VEIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in vain' (=unsuccessfully)?
Suggestion: in vain
... they are saving the birds, but that is in vein. Finally, the lecturer states that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28428093645 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45334239129 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508361204013 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4020088821 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203667276875 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722514888206 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048051882297 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131867170579 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515403062465 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.