Rembrandt
Rembrandt is one of the most distinguished Dutch painters. The art historians, however, cast a doubt whether some of his works were actually painted by him. The author in the reading passage discusses such painting and states that it was created by someone else. Nevertheless, the lecturer opposes this point of view by refuting all of his points.
According to the author, the first problem connected with the painting is the inconsistency about the woman's garment. She is wearing a type of clothes that only servant
would wear, but simultaneously there is a luxurious fur collar on her which a servant would not be able to afford. Rembrandt was known to be very attentive to such details, thus he wouldn't make such a mistake. Yet, the lecturer mentions recent scientific analysis which has shown that the collar was layered hundreds years later. She assumes that someone wanted to make the painting look more valuable by presenting it as a formal portrait.
In addition, the author talks about light and shadow details that do not fit together. Because of the dark fur collar, the face should appear partially in shadow, which is not how it appears. He claims that the famous painter wouldn't allow such flaws in the final result. Albeit, the lecturer believes that in the original version shadow and light proportion was well-balanced. As there was no collar on it, the shadow on the face was not needed.
Finally, the author brings up the examination of a back panel, on which the painting was painted on. It contained several wood pieces glued together. Rembrandt indeed used wooden panel for his art, but it was always made of only one solid piece. The lecturer believes that these small pieces were added later in order to make the painting look more valuable and expensive. Moreover, she assumes that the middle piece of the panel was made from the same tree, as another Rembrandt's painting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 83
- A zoo has no useful purpose 81
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 76
- Theories of Little Ice Age Causes 90
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring a type of clothes that only servant would wear, but simultaneously there is ...
^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...very attentive to such details, thus he wouldnt make such a mistake. Yet, the lecturer ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ears. He claims that the famous painter wouldnt allow such flaws in the final result. A...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91950464396 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53430866953 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8556615745 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6315789474 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128688913558 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454903785833 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910899444334 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693580088847 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603323996124 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.