rembrandt
Both the article and the lecture discuss the doubts whether a specific painting was painted by Rembrandt the famous Dutch painter. The painting mentioned is called “a portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet”. While the article claims that it wasn’t Rembrandt who painted this painting, the lecture however refutes this by providing many reasons that will be further elaborated in the following passage.
Firstly, the article mentioned there is no match between the linen cap that looked so cheap and the luxurious fur collar. This mismatch doesn’t coincide with the painter’s style who was known for his precision when it concerns the details. Meanwhile, the lecture challenges this by mentioning that the x-ray analysis made on the painting proved that the collar fur was added to the paintings hundred years later after the original portrait was painted to add value and increase the price of the painting when it looks like a portrait of an aristocratic lady rather than a normal woman.
Secondly, the article states that the error of shadow and light on the face of the woman makes it look unauthentic. Since Rembrandt is the master of light and shadow, there is no way he would do such a mistake. Clearly, the lecture debates this and mentioned that when the fur collar was added it created this mismatch between the shadow and light. She further interpreted that when the fur collar was removed, it was just a simple white collar. The revealed white collar would create the face illumination rather than shadowing.
Lastly, the article provided the fact that none of the other Rembrandt paintings used a panel of small pieces of wood glued together like the one used in this particular painting. The lecture opposes this by ensuring that the wood used in the painting is from the same tree that was used for the wood panel of all his other paintings. Moreover, the lecture stated that this panel was added to the main painting to increase its value just like what happened with the fur collar.
In conclusion, the claim that the painting wasn’t painted by Rembrandt is not well-founded
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- the extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles 70
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperature constant for instance humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37 degree no matter whether the environment is cold or warm polar dinosaurs leg po 73
- it is important to keep old friends than have new friends do you agree or disagree 70
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...e collar fur was added to the paintings hundred years later after the original portrait...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 357.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9299719888 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46520243511 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467787114846 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5251831079 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125258072685 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611961302565 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886019119289 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109912113636 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083327201068 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.