Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to cooperate with others is more important today than in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Throughout history, cooperating with others is one of the most important things one can do in daily life. Regarding this issue, some might argue that the ability to cooperate with others is not as necessary today as compared to that in the past. However, I strongly agree with the statement that the ability to cooperate with others is more important nowadays than in the past for two following reasons: the increase of globalized issues and the advancement of technology.
First and foremost, cooperating with others turned into a necessity due to globalized problems. The world has become more globalized than ever before. To be specific, people have encountered worldwide issues, which include pandemics, pollution, and etc. In order to come up with a successful solution for such crises, every country along with individuals have cooperated with others.This naturally resulted in the improvement of individuals’ social lives and the prosperity of nations. For instance, I once read a news article about how nations made efforts to cooperate with others by providing poor countries with Covid-19 vaccines. By this process, not in their own countries but they could also globally get rid of the virus. As these kinds of teamwork to pandemics are proven to be an effective solution, cooperation with others is clearly more significant today than in the past on a global and individual level.
Additionally, as new technologies have been introduced individuals’ modern lives have been becoming more complicated. People have been adapting to the rapidly changing world and they discovered that cooperating with others makes this adaptation easier. Eventually, as people become more dependent on each other, the ability to cooperate also becomes more significant than in the past. In an observational study held in 1998, the researchers compared two companies: one which had lots of partnership with other businesses, and the other which didn’t. Twenty years later, in 2018, the average annual growth rate of the former company was 48% higher than the latter. This definitely indicates that as technology advances, cooperation with others is more significant today than in the past,
Admittedly, some could argue that the ability to cooperate was more important in the past since individuals could not survive in the wild unless they were in groups. However, because of the increase of globalized issues and the advancement of technology, I strongly agree with the statement that the importance of one’s ability to cooperate with others has increased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-13 | Thomas2028 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have better lives than their parents had when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to cooperate with others is more important today than in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In a team those who do not accept others criticism cannot succeed 71
- Some students participate in school activities such as clubs and sports while other students spend more time on their studies Which do you prefer and why 76
- parents should decide about the future of children agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...es, which include pandemics, pollution, and etc. In order to come up with a successful s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...individuals have cooperated with others.This naturally resulted in the improvement o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35891089109 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91824335013 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50495049505 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3237554313 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.352941176 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412408833867 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149195846453 0.076458572812 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106695310749 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301878547575 0.150856017488 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811152800679 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.