Choosing one’s future is one of the most crucial decisions one makes when living life. Regarding this, some people argue that children should choose their own future, not their parents. Contradictorily, I personally agree with the aforementioned statement that parents should manipulate their children’s future for two reasons: parents can make better decisions, and parents can guide their children according to their aptitude.
First and foremost, parents can make wiser decisions than those of their children. To be specific, as parents lived a longer life than their children, they naturally have more experience, able to know the consequences of influential choices. As parents want their children to be successful or satisfied with their future, they will always choose the best for their children. For instance, Thomas Edison was a troublemaker when he was a child. His mother also knew that her son was a slow learner at school. Instead of sending him to school, she taught Edison herself, focusing on his curiosity and innovative ideas. Thanks to his mother’s education, he became a great inventor and his inventions especially, the light bulb, contributed to human society significantly. This clearly shows that parents can make wise decisions, resulting in a better future for their children.
In addition, parents know their children’s strengths and weaknesses the most. In fact, parents can make long term goals that take into account their children’s characteristics.
As a result, children do not have to spend excessive amounts of time and money while in the process of trial and error. To illustrate, my brother wanted to become a soccer player in his childhood. However, my mom knew that he was disadvantaged in physical condition for a soccer player. Instead, she advised my brother to become a writer as he was brilliant in writing. Realizing his talent, he accepted my mom’s advice and prepared to go to a school that specializes in writing, and much more. He is satisfied with his decision and this proves that parents are the most suitable person to decide their children’s future.
In conclusion, it is necessary for parents to choose their children’s future as parents can make wise decisions and parents are experts when it comes to their children. Admittedly, some could argue that children have the right to choose what they will become in the future, and they can also find new things while seeking their dream. Despite this, since the reasons mentioned before outweigh the other option, I strongly agree with the statement above.
- Some people think children should have unlimited access to the internet Others believe parents should supervise their children s use of the internet Which do you believe 80
- Television advertising directed toward young children should not be allowed 66
- Some students participate in school activities such as clubs and sports while other students spend more time on their studies Which do you prefer and why 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have better lives than their parents had when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to cooperate with others is more important today than in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...advised my brother to become a writer as he was brilliant in writing. Realizing h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25120772947 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82385228962 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519323671498 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5872328231 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8181818182 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246621442474 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790750810208 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830776060469 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164745009011 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596597688147 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.