Students nowadays study while using their phones, surfing the internet, or listening to music. Do you think these activities would adversely impact their study?
Recent years have witnessed the phenomenon quite often that some parents believe that using electronic products while studying will bring a severe negative impact for their academic performances. The discussion about whether studying while connecting to the internet becomes increasingly eye-catching. While some people be in favor of the opinion that studying while using electronic products will have a predictable adverse impact on their studies, I hold the standpoint that using these products during study time will not cause a negative impact on students’ study, instead, it will bring students a large number of positive effects to accelerate their studies.
Firstly, the internet will greatly enhance the accessibility for useful information, these materials allow students to study more comprehensively. There is no denying that the internet allows people access to information mush easily. For instance, when a student is learning English, he could use free electronic dictionary, attending classes freely if he haven’t fully understand the grammar his teacher taught during the daytime, inviting a native speaker to talk with him and refine his pronunciation. In this case, if students can use their phones while they are studying, they could access much more useful articles to improve their study effectiveness, by enjoying improved study effectiveness, students will tend to have better academic performance. Take for example myself, who is learning the Japanese through the internet and passed the Japanese-Language Proficiency Test N1. I collected various of information that could be used in my study from all kind of websites, includes dictionary, website with video-classes of my textbooks, and some websites allow me to talk with Japanese directly. Without the internet, I have no choice but learning from some unprofessional teachers.
In addition, listening music allows students to improve their study effectiveness instead of disturbing them. What can hardly be contradicted is enjoying music while studying will let you have a direct reflection of the level of your devotion. If you are devoted enough to your assignments, music will not become any obstacle of your study, but if you can hear each lyrics of the song you are playing, probably you are not orientated enough to have a high study effectiveness, it might because you are tired. At this time, taking a break will be a wiser choice. In this case, if students are allowed to listening to music while studying, a distinctive mark will emerge, and lead students to list a more reasonable study schedule. With a more comprehensive study schedule, students can study more effectively and get better academic performance.
Admittedly, restricting students from using electronic products while studying might lead them to concentrate easier within an environment without something to disturbing them. However, the lack of useful information from the internet and a useful way to ensure their study effectiveness, students are more likely to disappointed academic performance in long term.
Therefore, I hold the standpoint that using these products during study time will not cause a negative impact on students’ study, instead, it will bring students a large number of positive effects to accelerate their studies.
- Students nowadays study while using their phones surfing the internet or listening to music Do you think these activities would adversely impact their study 73
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity such as the job you have never done before Under this circumstance do you prefer to work alone or work with others 73
- Which of the following is most important to you when choosing where to live An area that is not expensive an area that is close to your families an area with many shops and restaurants 75
- Should high school students study many subjects at a time or only three to four subjects at a time 71
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage 52
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 602, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... study, instead, it will bring students a large number of positive effects to accelerate their st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... study, instead, it will bring students a large number of positive effects to accelerate their st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 5.04856512141 416% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 22.412803532 228% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2808.0 1373.03311258 205% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 509.0 270.72406181 188% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51669941061 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.04702891845 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02867441577 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 145.348785872 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463654223969 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.0 419.366225166 210% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.9369998054 49.2860985944 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.789473684 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7894736842 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400811259723 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138392435191 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870050530674 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249349653094 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437487870707 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.8541721854 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 63.6247240618 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.7273730684 182% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 602, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... study, instead, it will bring students a large number of positive effects to accelerate their st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... study, instead, it will bring students a large number of positive effects to accelerate their st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 5.04856512141 416% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 22.412803532 228% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2808.0 1373.03311258 205% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 509.0 270.72406181 188% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51669941061 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.04702891845 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02867441577 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 145.348785872 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463654223969 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.0 419.366225166 210% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.9369998054 49.2860985944 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.789473684 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7894736842 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400811259723 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138392435191 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870050530674 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249349653094 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437487870707 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.8541721854 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 63.6247240618 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.7273730684 182% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.