Should high school students study many subjects at a time or only three to four subjects at a time?
Recent years have witnessed the phenomenon quite often that a large number of high school students are complaining about their extensive curriculums. The discussion about whether students should study a curriculum that covering covers various fields, becoming increasingly eye-catching. While some people might be in favor of the opinion that high school students should study many subjects at a time because these subjects can broaden students’ horizons, I hold the standpoint that high school students should only learn a few subjects at a time.
Firstly, restricting the number of subjects to be learned at a time will lead students to reach better academic performance. There is no denying that fewer subjects allow students to be more devoted to their courses because they can organize their learning schedule more effectively. For instance, for a student who just has to be in charge of 3 subjects, he can formulate a schedule that let all subjects be distributed with enough time to be learned thoroughly--He can spend his morning on History or English, which subjects require students to learn by rote. Mornings are always the best time for students to remember and recite. However, if students have to learn many subjects at one time, they might have to learn 2 to 3 subjects that require students to remember a lot of knowledge, like theories, classical texts, and historical events. In this case, if students can study only 3 to 4 subjects at a time, they can use their time more effectively. By studying more effectively, students can obtain better academic performance.
In addition, letting high school students learn a few subjects at a time allows the treatment of teachers to be improved. What can hardly be contradicted is that if students have to study numerous subjects at a time, the school authority has to hire various teachers; fine art, geography, and physics. However, if students just have to learn a few subjects, the school can hire fewer teachers. With fewer teachers being hired, the importance of each teacher will be enhanced. The wages of teachers will be improved, as result. Take for example my friend Boris, a choreographer of at an art high school. Even though we are both teachers serving at senior high schools, his treatments are much better than mine. In his school, students just need to learn essential regular courses like basic math. Most teachers are in charging charge of art and music. Under such circumstances, his school just hired less than 100 teachers for thousands of students. However, in my senior high school, students have to learn various subjects. Therefore, the school authority hired hundreds of teachers to fit these curriculums. Thus, the importance of each teacher in my high school is much lower than it in Boris’s school, and the treatment for teachers is also slender.
Overall, I hold the standpoint that high school students should only learn a few subjects at a time.
- Students nowadays study while using their phones surfing the internet or listening to music Do you think these activities would adversely impact their study 73
- Which of the following is most important to you when choosing where to live An area that is not expensive an area that is close to your families an area with many shops and restaurants 75
- Should high school students study many subjects at a time or only three to four subjects at a time 71
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage 52
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity such as the job you have never done before Under this circumstance do you prefer to work alone or work with others 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tnessed the phenomenon quite often that a large number of high school students are complaining ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2469.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08024691358 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77544865011 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438271604938 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9491158873 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70833333333 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476571467076 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165383065284 0.076458572812 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164730400672 0.0737576698707 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409274424292 0.150856017488 271% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116182655371 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.