Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, however, is that any Internet user can contribute a new article or make an editorial change in an existing one. As a result, the encyclopedia is authored by the whole community of Internet users. The idea might sound attractive, but the communal online encyclopedias have several important problems that make them much less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedias.
First, contributors to a communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials, thereby making their contributions partially informed at best and downright inaccurate in many cases. Traditional encyclopedias are written by trained experts who adhere to standards of academic rigor that nonspecialists cannot really achieve.
The reading and the lecture are both about the Communal online and tradicional encyclopedias. The author of the reading feels that there are three explanations for the use of the tradicional encyclopedia. The lecture challenges the claims made by de author. She is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the author argues that traditional encyclopedias are written by trained experts who understand the academic rigor that need to be used. The article mentions that this communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials and contributions are partially informed in many cases. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. She states that mistakes can have in both types of cases. Moreover, she says that in online encyclopedia the authors can change the error quickly, but in the tradicional type a fault information may will be correct in more time.
Secondly, the writer suggest that the tradicional encyclopedias are safe of vandals or hackers. In the article, it is said that in online encyclopedia someone can have the opportunity to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information. The lecture, however, rebuts this by mentioning that in communal online style there are main informations that can not be changed. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that online encyclopedias have specials editors who eliminated informations that are fallacy.
Finally, the author posits that traditional encyclopedia provides a sense of proportion and a"democratic" point of view. Moreover, in the article it is stated that communal encyclopedias focus on trivial and popular topics that are not the principal point of determined subject. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that in communal online encyclopedias there are enough space to put all of information about determined topic. She notes that tradicional encyclopedias do not have much spaces as an online encyclopedias. So, she believes that many topics do not represent the real interest of information that people are searching.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 76
- TPO9 Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 60
- TPO26 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents jobs 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he use of the tradicional encyclopedia. The lecture challenges the claims made by d...
^^^
Line 8, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stated that communal encyclopedias focus on trivial and popular topics that are n...
^^
Line 8, column 494, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...t tradicional encyclopedias do not have much spaces as an online encyclopedias. So, ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 519, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'encyclopedia'?
Suggestion: encyclopedia
...as do not have much spaces as an online encyclopedias. So, she believes that many topics do n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49211356467 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25876211097 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492113564669 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8537226833 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7222222222 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206828407489 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683768712816 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363808810748 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131808456055 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00991386915408 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he use of the tradicional encyclopedia. The lecture challenges the claims made by d...
^^^
Line 8, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stated that communal encyclopedias focus on trivial and popular topics that are n...
^^
Line 8, column 494, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...t tradicional encyclopedias do not have much spaces as an online encyclopedias. So, ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 519, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'encyclopedia'?
Suggestion: encyclopedia
...as do not have much spaces as an online encyclopedias. So, she believes that many topics do n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49211356467 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25876211097 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492113564669 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8537226833 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7222222222 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206828407489 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683768712816 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363808810748 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131808456055 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00991386915408 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.