summarize the point of view of the passage and the lecture
The main topic of both passage and lecture is about possibility of permanent living on Mars and Venus. The passage brings up some reasons that shows living on these planets are impossible; on the other hand, the professor completely denies whatever mentioned in the passage.
First, the passage asserts that atmosphere pressure on the Venus is more than the earth, and if any space craft goes on it, it will be crushed on a second. However, the professor refutes this, state that the space craft does not have to land on the surface, and it can be flouting above the surface, like a balloon. So, the surface pressure will be equal to the Earth.
Second, the passage explains that there is no water sources on the Venus and contains rare oxygen, and people have to bring these to the Venus from the Earth, consequently, it can not be a permanent station. In contrast the professor points that there is nitrogen and carbon dioxide, so it does not need to bring water from the Earth, they can obtain water and oxygen easily.
Third, the passage goes on to mention that there is not enough sun light because of the thick cloud around the Venus, as a result, lack of light do not let humans produce solar power cells. Nevertheless, the professor support a contradictory view as compared to the passage; he describes, although there is thick cloud, it is possible the sun light goes to the surface through the cloud. In addition, there is some light reflected too, and it is possible to generate energy from both of these.
- television influences on people 73
- about Agnostids 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement, idea that because people are so busy these days, they are capable of doing a few things well 60
- do you agree or disagree with this statement. today's young people do not give enough time to helping their communities 70
- studying 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
..., it can not be a permanent station. In contrast the professor points that there is nitr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in addition, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69402985075 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41190289242 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514925373134 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6330355006 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.8 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3 7.06452816374 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129130975108 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477437761015 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442778300681 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729583880922 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393626593615 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.