Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage.
As technology gets more sophisticated, a thing called a smart car will become widespread in use. The passage claims that smart cars will improve our lives in a variety of ways, such as dispersed traffic accidents, saved time, and reduction of costs. But a lecturer thinks that it is not clear if smart cars will bring us benefits or not.
The lecture disagrees about the view of dispersed traffic accidents. It thinks that nothing in the world is perfect, and it also applies to cars. Every single car will someday have accidents as long as it is being used. It doesn't matter if it is a smart car or a normal car, or if it has sensors or not. Also, since the cars are closely packed together at high speeds, then if they collide, a collision will become a pile-up with cars all over the place.
When new cars are released, people will like to drive them because people will expect the cars to be convenient and fast. The next problem is that an increased amount of cars with higher speeds on a highway will affect the drivers who will not have the chance of releasing the car's full potential of being fast. A jammed highway will result in slower speed of cars and therefore will not save time.
Lastly, the lecture put forward that the cost of maintaining a smart car is very expensive. For example, the GPS that the car relies on is very expensive to use. Also, the parts destroyed in accidents are expensive to fix thanks to its advanced technology. So, as one can see, the cost of maintaining a smart car is way more expensive than a normal car. Therefore, it will not save money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Alana Gerber | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | waliwaliwa | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-11 | Louissun | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 3 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage 3
- 1 3
- Students could recieve a better more effecient education if they spend 11 months a year studying 80
- A person should never make an important decision alone 71
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cidents as long as it is being used. It doesnt matter if it is a smart car or a normal...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so, then, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39814881044 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0290743032 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5625 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0374991763122 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0162937259761 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0172645207776 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0273832083386 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102625636088 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.3589403974 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 12.2367328918 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.