As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks?
Globalization has made a huge impact in today's comercialization. Many countries that do not have ways to grow their own food lay in the trade with others. Albeit some people believe that the trade among countries has some hindrances, others think that trading is crucial for some countries' economy. I tend to agree that the benefits surely outweigh the drawbacks.
First of all, not every country is capable of surviving by itself. They have to barter goods among other countries due to the meager of goods from its side and, if they have shortages of other products they have the desideratum of exchanging products. Therefore, it is a win-win for both parts.
Moreover, if it is a long distance to transporte the products, it is still worth to do so because what can be produced in one country, it cannot be produced in another and vice-versa. For example, in Brazil there are many areas to grow not merely because of the soil but, also because of the climate. If we observe the conditions in Europe, we can see that even though the its soil can be good, its climate does not contribute for growing.
Finally, as it is state in this article, the benefits will always outdo the drawbacks because only the facilities at which the benefits lay in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... think that trading is crucial for some countries economy. I tend to agree that the benef...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
... in Europe, we can see that even though the its soil can be good, its climate does not ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73059360731 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63449347471 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598173515982 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6655011513 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1818181818 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192923098371 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597434969985 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365438708532 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101498648852 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216046792029 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.